2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.107003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of thed-Wave Superconducting State near the Edge of Antiferromagnetism in the Cuprate Phase Diagram

Abstract: In the cuprate superconductor YBa2Cu3O6+x, hole doping in the CuO2 layers is controlled by both oxygen content and the degree of oxygen ordering. At the composition YBa2Cu3O6.35, the ordering can occur at room temperature, thereby tuning the hole doping so that the superconducting critical temperature gradually rises from 0 to 20 K. Here we exploit this to study the c-axis penetration depth as a function of temperature and doping. The temperature dependence shows the d-wave superconductor surviving to very low… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
63
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
5
63
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This model appears to explain the data on hole doped cuprates, including extremely underdoped YBCO. [93] These same experiments indicate that nodal quasiparticles persist even in extremely underdoped materials and are a robust feature of the copper oxides. [126] Strong anisotropy does not necessitate incoherent transport.…”
Section: Nonlocal Electrodynamics Of Nodal Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This model appears to explain the data on hole doped cuprates, including extremely underdoped YBCO. [93] These same experiments indicate that nodal quasiparticles persist even in extremely underdoped materials and are a robust feature of the copper oxides. [126] Strong anisotropy does not necessitate incoherent transport.…”
Section: Nonlocal Electrodynamics Of Nodal Superconductorsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…We also assume that J Ќ / J is independent of doping, and we choose J Ќ / J =10 −3 , which is appropriate in the range of doping considered. 17 Thus, the only remaining free parameter is , which can be chosen by fitting the temperature dependence of the data around the transition. The result, reported in Fig.…”
Section: ͑8͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9] While this seems to be appealing, other consequences that follow the DDW picture are still in debates. For example, the temperature derivative of the superfluid density at low temperatures was claimed to be insensitive to the doping deep in the under-doped limit of YBCO thin films, [10] but another group reported that in YBCO crystals it tends to diverge with under-doping. [11] While DDW picture is consistent with the latter, it can not account for the former results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%