2013
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215113001072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of the 8.5 mm osseointegrated abutment, and its utility in the obese patient

Abstract: The 8.5 mm abutment may be useful in patients with copious subcutaneous soft tissue as in the obese population. The 8.5 mm abutment has a calculated mechanical disadvantage, potentially putting the implant under greater mechanical stress; however, the clinical relevance of this is unclear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to preventative efforts aimed at tackling this problem, the treatment of many conditions must be modified in obese patients. Darley and Mikulec 4 investigate modification of the application of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) technology in obese patients by the use of a longer, 8.5 mm osseointegrated abutment. They conclude that although the longer abutment has potential for use in patients with thick subcutaneous soft tissue, it does act at a calculated mechanical disadvantage putting the implant under greater stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to preventative efforts aimed at tackling this problem, the treatment of many conditions must be modified in obese patients. Darley and Mikulec 4 investigate modification of the application of bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) technology in obese patients by the use of a longer, 8.5 mm osseointegrated abutment. They conclude that although the longer abutment has potential for use in patients with thick subcutaneous soft tissue, it does act at a calculated mechanical disadvantage putting the implant under greater stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%