Survival of Patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia during the ECMO era: An 11-year experience

Ssemakula, Noah; Stewart, Dan L.; Goldsmith, L. Jane; Cook, Larry N.; Bond, Sheldon J.

doi:10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90506-6

Cited by 65 publications

(61 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…16 Quality of included studies Our search identified retrospective, single-center case series or case vs historical control comparisons, raising the possibility of both selection and performance bias. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The improvement in outcomes noted in reports comparing serial epochs are accompanied by reports of changes in clinical practice. Details of various practices (specifics of antenatal care, ventilation strategy, PPHN management strategy and use of ECMO) were not uniformly recorded in all studies.…”

Section: Selection Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Survival for isolated CDH for the successful centers was 560/661 (85%; range: 78 to 96%). [15][16][17][18][19][20][22][23][24][25]27 Reported survival for isolated CDH using conventional medical management, excluding ECMO but including high-frequency ventilation was 331/367 (90%; range: 83 to 100%). The frequency of ECMO use for isolated CDH was 251/622 (40%; range: 11 to 61%), and overall survival for infants with isolated CDH placed on ECMO was 149/206 (73%; range: 33 to 86%; Table 1).…”

Section: Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the successful centers adopted a strategy of 'gentle ventilation' or 'permissive hypercapnia'. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Mortality was generally attributed to the presence of additional anomalies, iatrogenic lung injury, severe pulmonary hypoplasia and/or PPHN, and bleeding complications (among ECMO-treated infants). One report suggested that after excluding CDH infants with additional anomalies, 'hopeless pulmonary hypoplasia' occurred in no more than 15% of isolated CDH infants.…”

Section: Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among centers reporting antenatal care, 354/630 CDH infants (56%) were prenatally diagnosed, and 247 of 763 infants (33%) were inborn. [15][16][17][18][20][21][22][23]25,27 Reports varied on whether or not prenatal diagnosis or site of delivery was reported or associated with improved survival, but the combined reports suggest that delivery at a tertiary center was beneficial. For most centers, survival increased for both inborns and prenatally diagnosed infants in the most recent epoch of care.…”

Section: Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4 Literature review reveals a limited number of controlled clinical trials examining interventions that improve survival of infants with CDH; [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] however, several centers reporting relatively high rates of survival for CDH have described their management strategies in varying detail. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] The objective of this report is to provide clinicians with a summary of specific details of clinical care strategies from these 'benchmark' centers. In the absence of clinical trials, this summary of practice strategies provides a starting point for development of an approach to care for infants with CDH.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: Recent reports suggest that specific care strategies improve survival of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). This review presents details of care from centers reporting high rates of survival among CDH infants.Study Design: We conducted a MEDLINE search (1995 to 2006) and searched all citations in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Studies were included if they contained reports of >20 infants with symptomatic CDH, and >75% survival of isolated CDH.Result: Thirteen reports from 11 centers met inclusion criteria. Overall survival, including infants with multiple anomalies, was 603/763 (79%; range: 69 to 93%). Survival for isolated CDH was 560/661 (85%; range: 78 to 96%). The frequency of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use for isolated CDH varied widely among reporting centers 251/622 (40%; range: 11 to 61%), as did survival for infants with isolated CDH placed on ECMO: 149/206 (73%; range: 33 to 86%). There was no suggestion of benefit from use of antenatal glucocorticoids given after 34 weeks gestation or use of postnatal surfactant. Low mortality was frequently attributed to minimizing lung injury and adhering to center-specific criteria for ECMO.Conclusion: Use of strategies aimed at minimizing lung injury, tolerance of postductal acidosis and hypoxemia, and adhering to center-specific criteria for ECMO were strategies most consistently reported by successful centers. The literature lacks randomized clinical trials of these or other care strategies in this complex patient population; prospective studies of safety and long-term outcome are needed. Keywords: congenital diaphragmatic hernia; pulmonary hypertension; pulmonary hypoplasia; inhaled nitric oxide; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; systematic review Introduction Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare malformation observed in approximately 1 in 3000 live births, with estimates of postnatal survival ranging from 50 to 70% despite advances in neonatal care. 1 The combination of pathophysiologic derangements associated with CDH, including lung hypoplasia, lung dysmaturity and pulmonary hypertension (PPHN), requires a multidisciplinary approach to care. 2,3 The complex nature of clinical management and the relatively infrequent presentation of infants with this rare malformation to single centers has lead to difficulty identifying consistent strategies for CDH management. A recent report from the Canadian Neonatal Research Network indicates better than predicted survival in Network centers, with significant improvement in the higher mortality odds strata, and 90% survival in the three centers that cared for at least 12 infants over a 22-month period. Details of management strategies are not provided, but the report suggests that survival is best achieved by caring for CDH infants at centers that have developed a standardized approach to care, with adequate numbers of CDH infants to develop expertise. 4 Literature review reveals a limited number of controlled clinical trials examining inter...

show abstract

Section: Selection Criteriamentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Survivalmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies

et al. 2007

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Beresford

Shaw

2000

Pediatr. Pulmonol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) differs for different stages of the fetus or infant's life (i.e., antenatal, immediate postnatal, and postoperative). Assessing combined data from nonrandomized studies is technically difficult. Following recognized methods of reviewing such trials, we aimed to review the available literature on the outcome of CDH to provide a guide to clinicians when counselling parents who have a fetus/infant with this condition. Thirty‐five studies reporting data for CDH from 1985 to March 1998 were identified using a high sensitive search strategy, hand‐searching journals, and reviewing references of relevant studies. These were systematically reviewed. The median overall mortality was 58% (interquartile range (IQR), 43–65%) for babies diagnosed in utero, 48% (IQR, 35–55%) if born alive, and 33% (IQR, 18–54%) postoperatively. Diagnosis before 25 weeks of gestation is not a uniformly bad prognostic indicator (median mortality, 60%). Outcome was worse for those fetuses with other anomalies (median mortality, 93%). The median percentage mortality for all infants born alive and treated in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers was 34% (IQR, 26–47%). Median percentage mortality for all ECMO‐treated infants was 44% (IQR, 35–50%). Different treatment strategies may have a variable impact on outcome. These figures, together with local data, may help in parental counselling on prognosis for fetuses/infants with CDH. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2000; 30:249–256. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

show abstract

Outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Beresford¹,

Shaw²

2000

Pediatr. Pulmonol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) differs for different stages of the fetus or infant's life (i.e., antenatal, immediate postnatal, and postoperative). Assessing combined data from nonrandomized studies is technically difficult. Following recognized methods of reviewing such trials, we aimed to review the available literature on the outcome of CDH to provide a guide to clinicians when counselling parents who have a fetus/infant with this condition. Thirty-five studies reporting data for CDH from 1985 to March 1998 were identified using a high sensitive search strategy, hand-searching journals, and reviewing references of relevant studies. These were systematically reviewed.The median overall mortality was 58% (interquartile range (IQR), 43-65%) for babies diagnosed in utero, 48% (IQR, 35-55%) if born alive, and 33% (IQR, 18-54%) postoperatively. Diagnosis before 25 weeks of gestation is not a uniformly bad prognostic indicator (median mortality, 60%). Outcome was worse for those fetuses with other anomalies (median mortality, 93%). The median percentage mortality for all infants born alive and treated in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers was 34% (IQR, 26-47%). Median percentage mortality for all ECMO-treated infants was 44% (IQR, 35-50%). Different treatment strategies may have a variable impact on outcome. These figures, together with local data, may help in parental counselling on prognosis for fetuses/infants with CDH.

show abstract

Survival of Patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia during the ECMO era: An 11-year experience

Cited by 65 publications

References 33 publications

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a systematic review and summary of best-evidence practice strategies

Outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Outcome of congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About