2004
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2261-4-22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of patients treated with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation at a tertiary care center in Pakistan – patient characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality

Abstract: Background: Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABC) has an established role in the treatment of patients presenting with critical cardiac illnesses, including cardiogenic shock, refractory ischemia and for prophylaxis and treatment of complications of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Patients requiring IABC represent a high-risk subset with an expected high mortality. There are virtually no data on usage patterns as well as outcomes of patients in the Indo-Pakistan subcontinent who require IABC.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other interventions that have been performed for patients with limited options included IABP for patients with refractory angina or cardiogenic shock. [ 40 41 ] Cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) application to the ischemic myocardium in patients with refractory angina pectoris was found to improve symptoms and reduce the severity of ischemic areas at 6 months after CSWT treatment compared with the baseline. [ 42 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interventions that have been performed for patients with limited options included IABP for patients with refractory angina or cardiogenic shock. [ 40 41 ] Cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) application to the ischemic myocardium in patients with refractory angina pectoris was found to improve symptoms and reduce the severity of ischemic areas at 6 months after CSWT treatment compared with the baseline. [ 42 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%