2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of palatal miniscrews used for orthodontic appliance anchorage: A retrospective cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
13

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
36
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…This side also exhibited greater failure rates in other studies, with (22) or without (1,4,15,16) statistically significant evidence to account for differences in the success rate. This result may be related to factors such as preferred side of mastication, access difficulties when placing the OMS or viewing the right or left side (7,10,22), different levels of oral hygiene among righties and lefties (23,24), and random statistical errors (5). Studies differ when trying to show that right-handed (24) or left-handed (25) patients keep better hygiene, or attempting to prove that manual dexterity is not linked to plaque control (23), but motivation is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This side also exhibited greater failure rates in other studies, with (22) or without (1,4,15,16) statistically significant evidence to account for differences in the success rate. This result may be related to factors such as preferred side of mastication, access difficulties when placing the OMS or viewing the right or left side (7,10,22), different levels of oral hygiene among righties and lefties (23,24), and random statistical errors (5). Studies differ when trying to show that right-handed (24) or left-handed (25) patients keep better hygiene, or attempting to prove that manual dexterity is not linked to plaque control (23), but motivation is.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…24 The anterior palatal region is preferred because it is far from the roots and the anatomic structures, provides adequate bone support, and is associated with high success rates. 11 Baumgaertel 12 stated that the first premolars have the greatest cortical bone thickness in the palatal region. Distalization was performed using direct anchorage with miniscrews for adequate anchorage support; thus, anchorage loss was prevented, and the spontaneous movements could be observed for all teeth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anterior palate is considered to be a safe region for miniscrew insertion because it is far from the tooth roots and important anatomic structures. 11,12 Another advantage of palatal anchored distalization mechanics is that there is no need to use full fixed appliances during the distalization period. Many authors have examined the effects of intraoral distalization performed with support from the miniscrews placed in this region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The midpalatal area is suitable for miniscrew implantation with high stability and low failure rates 7 because of the following reasons: (1) the absence of important anatomic structures including major nerves or blood vessels, (2) no risk of contacting dental roots, and (3) adequate cortical bone thickness for the primary stability of the miniscrews. 8,9 The placement of miniscrews and the fabrication of connecting wire is described in detail in a previous report.…”
Section: Two Midpalatal Miniscrews Connecting a Wire Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%