2013
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.12465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of multiple myeloma patients in the era of novel therapies confirms the improvement in patients younger than 75 years: a population‐based analysis

Abstract: SummaryNovel treatments for multiple myeloma (MM) have shown promising results in clinical trials, but the advantage in unselected patients is still unclear. In order to evaluate whether novel therapies impact survival of MM patients, we performed a population-based analysis on data collected Despite the limits of this study, these data refer to an unselected population, giving a picture of every day clinical practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, we followed a strategy of applying 200mg/m2 melphalan before ASCT in myeloma patients below 70 years, and we reduced melphalan to 140mg/m2 for mg/m2 in elderly myeloma patients was reported to be up to 19% (17), while that for 100 mg/m2 of melphalan was 0% (19) and 2% for 140 mg/m2 melphalan (20). Our single-center results with a TRM of 0% in 71 myeloma patients aged 66-69 years treated with 200mg/m2 melphalan challenge the need for dose reductions in myeloma patients in this age cohort considered to be fit for high-dose consolidation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, we followed a strategy of applying 200mg/m2 melphalan before ASCT in myeloma patients below 70 years, and we reduced melphalan to 140mg/m2 for mg/m2 in elderly myeloma patients was reported to be up to 19% (17), while that for 100 mg/m2 of melphalan was 0% (19) and 2% for 140 mg/m2 melphalan (20). Our single-center results with a TRM of 0% in 71 myeloma patients aged 66-69 years treated with 200mg/m2 melphalan challenge the need for dose reductions in myeloma patients in this age cohort considered to be fit for high-dose consolidation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the significant improvement in overall survival has mainly been observed in younger MM patients [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], whereas advances for elderly MM patients have been less significant [11,14,16,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median number of study treatment cycles was 6 (range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and 49 patients (70%) received 90% of the relative intended dose of elotuzumab. Of the 1,113 elotuzumab infusions given, 87% (968) were given at the maximum 5 mL/min rate; of the remaining 13% (145), 144…”
Section: R E S U L T S 31 | Patients and Dosingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In recent years, several new therapeutic agents have been introduced. [2][3][4][5] Current treatment guidelines recommend autologous stem cell transplantation (when eligible), chemotherapy (melphalan, cyclophosphamide, or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin), proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based regimens (bortezomib, carfilzomib, or ixazomib), and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-based regimens (thalidomide, lenalidomide, or pomalidomide), often coupled with a corticosteroid (eg, dexamethasone). Combined treatments (usually three agents; triplets) have been notably effective in improving patient outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,[21][22][23] In aggregate, it appears that while the incidence of multiple myeloma is rising, mortality rates are dropping. Because our study used aggregate population estimates, the issue of competing risks between non-renal death and ESRD could not be addressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%