1996
DOI: 10.1056/nejm199607183350306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of Medicare Patients after Enrollment in Hospice Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
303
5
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 507 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
18
303
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is quite possible that inaccurate or overoptimistic assessment of prognosis led to longer fractionation schemes. Despite limitations of prognostication tools, and the accepted challenges of estimating survival, 23 hospice enrollment is generally considered a marker of limited life expectancy, 24,25 consistent with the findings in this study that found a median of 13 days from hospice enrollment through death.…”
Section: Survivalsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…It is quite possible that inaccurate or overoptimistic assessment of prognosis led to longer fractionation schemes. Despite limitations of prognostication tools, and the accepted challenges of estimating survival, 23 hospice enrollment is generally considered a marker of limited life expectancy, 24,25 consistent with the findings in this study that found a median of 13 days from hospice enrollment through death.…”
Section: Survivalsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[15][16][17][18][19][20] The adequate utilization of hospice services requires timely referral of terminally ill patients to hospice programs. 21,22 Hospice care remains underutilized and patients are often referred to hospice very late in the course of their disease. [21][22][23][24][25][26] This may be because some terminal cancer patients want to continue cancer treatment options until they are too weak to tolerate them or because some patients think that hospice wards are places to go to die.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is identified clearly in the literature that clinicians have highly specific emotional, cognitive, and skill barriers to engaging in ACP (19). Emotional barriers often stem from their belief that such discussions would take away patients' hope, and physicians often explain their reticence to give a prognosis by virtue of the tendency of most patients not to ask for one (21,22). This study should help clinicians overcome some of the emotional barriers to ACP because these patients seemed more accepting of death as an inevitable outcome than their health care providers, and, contrary to popular belief, patients wanted to discuss end-of-life issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%