1993
DOI: 10.1080/10934529309375943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of indicator organisms in Sonoran Desert soil amended with sewage sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that following biosolids land application, the lack of selective pressures for antibiotic resistance may cause the loss of the plasmid carrying the resistant genes and, hence, may lead to lower overall antibiotic-resistant bacterial recovery (Smith and Bidochka 1998). Furthermore, the overall loss of bacterial viability following biosolids land application may have contributed to any noted decreases (Pepper et al 1993;Zaleski et al 2005); however, all differences were statistically irrelevant. No increase in ARB concentrations or percentages was noted throughout the study period, particularly, during the first 14 days following application, suggesting that an immediate dilution effect of any biosolids-borne antibiotic-resistant organisms may be the cause.…”
Section: Fig 2 Heterotrophic Plate Count (Hpc) and Antibiotic-resismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…It is possible that following biosolids land application, the lack of selective pressures for antibiotic resistance may cause the loss of the plasmid carrying the resistant genes and, hence, may lead to lower overall antibiotic-resistant bacterial recovery (Smith and Bidochka 1998). Furthermore, the overall loss of bacterial viability following biosolids land application may have contributed to any noted decreases (Pepper et al 1993;Zaleski et al 2005); however, all differences were statistically irrelevant. No increase in ARB concentrations or percentages was noted throughout the study period, particularly, during the first 14 days following application, suggesting that an immediate dilution effect of any biosolids-borne antibiotic-resistant organisms may be the cause.…”
Section: Fig 2 Heterotrophic Plate Count (Hpc) and Antibiotic-resismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Salmonellae were not able to survive and regrow in biosolids alone or in a soil environment, even when conditions of moisture and temperature were favorable for growth. Experiments were also done in fine-textured soil, which has been shown to provide more protection for organisms than coarse-textured soils (14), and the Salmonella organisms still could not survive or regrow in this environment. The death of salmonellae in this environment may be due to the presence of high levels of coliforms in the biosolids or indigenous soil organisms which survived and regrew biosolids and biosolidamended soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many laboratory studies have been conducted in the past, focusing on survival and potential growth of inoculated organisms in sterile and nonsterile biosolids and compost (2,10,15,18,27). Regrowth of inoculated salmonellae in sterile biosolids is commonly documented, but few studies have documented survival and regrowth of indigenous pathogens in biosolids after levels have decreased below levels of detection (8,11,14,16). Due to limited available data regarding regrowth of salmonellae in biosolids used for land application, there are conflicting views on this topic.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since one of the primary hazards associated with biosolids is the accumulation of pathogenic microorganisms, public concern regarding the potential exposure of the human population to the sludge derived microbial pathogens is becoming common. Though there have been numerous studies and reports on pathogen survival in agricultural lands and waterways associated with biosolids (Hill et al, 1993, Pepper et al, 1993 there is only limited published information on the occurrence of airborne microbial pathogens being generated from land application programs (Pillai et al, 1996;Jakubowski 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%