2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of European children and young adults with cancer diagnosed 1995–2002

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

15
325
4
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(350 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
15
325
4
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Across Europe survival rates improved for children diagnosed with CNS tumours and in particular CNS embryonal tumours between 1995 and 2002 (30). Other studies have also shown a general improvement in survival for childhood CNS tumours over the last [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] years identifying improvements in CNS embryonal tumour survival specifically (3,16,19,30,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across Europe survival rates improved for children diagnosed with CNS tumours and in particular CNS embryonal tumours between 1995 and 2002 (30). Other studies have also shown a general improvement in survival for childhood CNS tumours over the last [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] years identifying improvements in CNS embryonal tumour survival specifically (3,16,19,30,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have also shown a general improvement in survival for childhood CNS tumours over the last [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] years identifying improvements in CNS embryonal tumour survival specifically (3,16,19,30,31). TYA, aged 16-24 years, from Yorkshire showed a significant increase in survival from medulloblastoma and CNS PNET combined between 1990 and 2009 (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Major improvements in the treatment of childhood malignancies have led to increased survival, with 5-year survival rates reaching .80% in Europe (1). As survival has greatly improved, the effect of late adverse effects after treatment for childhood cancer has increased correspondingly (2)(3)(4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we excluded patients hierarchically if they [1] had significant congenital heart disease or a history of cardiac dysfunction prior to their cancer diagnosis; [2] developed cardiac dysfunction during therapy or in the first year after completing therapy, characterized by overt CHF or two consecutive echocardiographic studies with reduced EF or SF in the absence of clinical symptoms; [3] died prior to 1 year after the completion of their cancer therapy; or [4] were transferred to another pediatric institution or were discharged from care at age 18 years, prior to being 1 year from the conclusion of therapy. We then assessed the frequency of abnormal surveillance echocardiograms performed more than 1 year from the conclusion of therapy in the eligible cohort and categorized them according to the 12 risk categories identified in the COG LTFU guidelines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%