2004
DOI: 10.1080/14660820410021311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival of 793 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis diagnosed over a 28-year period

Abstract: We reviewed retrospectively 793 consecutive patients discharged with ALS diagnosis between 1971 and 1998 to identify survival predictors. Vital status in July 2001 was known for all patients. Mean age at onset was 56 (SD 11.7) years and mean age at diagnosis was 57.4 (SD 11.5) years. Onset symptoms were bulbar in 20.8% of patients. The median survival time from symptoms onset was 2.9 years (95% CI 2.7-3.1). Survival from onset was 93% after one, 48% after three and 24% after five years. Median survival was sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(26 reference statements)
6
63
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A population-based cohort study is less likely to be biased, but it is difficult to achieve the same level of clinical detail and sample size required for analysis of the natural history of relatively uncommon subgroups such as the FA and FL syndromes. 23,24 Nonetheless, median survival from symptom onset in the bulbar and limb onset ALS groups in our study is comparable to that found in previous large clinicbased cohort studies 6,31,32 and in large population registry studies, 4,5 making it unlikely that we have overestimated survival. In the future, large populationbased samples comprising detailed and standardized phenotypic information will be required to validate or modify our conclusions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A population-based cohort study is less likely to be biased, but it is difficult to achieve the same level of clinical detail and sample size required for analysis of the natural history of relatively uncommon subgroups such as the FA and FL syndromes. 23,24 Nonetheless, median survival from symptom onset in the bulbar and limb onset ALS groups in our study is comparable to that found in previous large clinicbased cohort studies 6,31,32 and in large population registry studies, 4,5 making it unlikely that we have overestimated survival. In the future, large populationbased samples comprising detailed and standardized phenotypic information will be required to validate or modify our conclusions.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Using the PRO-ACT database allowed for validation of these findings; for example, site of onset has been shown to affect the slope of ALSFRS and overall survival time [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41], with bulbar onset leading to poor prognosis compared with limb onset. Similarly, age of onset was predictive of prognosis (with poorer prognosis for patients with an later disease onset [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]). Other factors connected to prognosis in previous reports included body mass index or absolute weight [42,45]; cognitive functioning [46]; level of uric acid [42,47]; and levels of albumin and creatinine [48,49].…”
Section: Understanding Als Clinical Manifestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Индивидуальное течение болезни может быть крайне вариабельным и трудно прогнозируемым, несмотря на разработку в последние годы ряда относительно точных предиктивных моде-лей [44]. После постановки диагноза >1 года живут 76 % пациентов, >5 лет -24 %, >10 лет -11 % [45]. Выявлены несколько мутаций, ассоциированных с медленным (например, Asp90Ala в гене СОД1) или, напротив, быстрым (Ala4Val в гене СОД1) прогресси-рованием болезни [16].…”
Section: Exclusion Criteriaunclassified