2017
DOI: 10.1002/hed.24739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival impact of induction chemotherapy in advanced head and neck cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis

Abstract: Induction chemotherapy subjects experienced no survival advantage over concurrent chemotherapy subjects but were more likely to receive lower RT doses. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 1113-1121, 2017.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the therapeutic efficacy of systemic therapy is limited. The 5 years overall survival (OS) rate of HNSC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy is approximately 50% (Lin et al, 2016), and the median OS time is 66.3 months (Stokes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the therapeutic efficacy of systemic therapy is limited. The 5 years overall survival (OS) rate of HNSC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy is approximately 50% (Lin et al, 2016), and the median OS time is 66.3 months (Stokes et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that their algorithm for dose de‐escalation in RT or CRT based on response to IC and risk‐stratification was associated with favorable survival outcomes and reduced acute and chronic toxicity 19 . A National Cancer Data Base review of IC did not show a survival impact but patients were more likely to receive a reduced RT dose, <66 Gy, if they received RT; presumably resulting in reduced radiation‐associated acute and chronic toxicities 20 . The findings of these three studies suggest a role for a reduced radiation dose in HPV positive patients that demonstrate effective cytoreduction from IC to minimize radiation related toxicities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 5 , 7 , 11 13 ] Despite this, there is controversy as to whether this translates to an improved overall survival outcome. [ 14 , 15 ] It has been suggested, however, that as well as several problems with poor methodology undermining the applicability of trials comparing ICT to CRT alone; trials have included patients that are unlikely to benefit from the potential advantages of ICT such as those with a low risk of distant metastases, hence diluting any positive effects. [ 14 ] Tumour heterogeneity also affects response to treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 14 , 15 ] It has been suggested, however, that as well as several problems with poor methodology undermining the applicability of trials comparing ICT to CRT alone; trials have included patients that are unlikely to benefit from the potential advantages of ICT such as those with a low risk of distant metastases, hence diluting any positive effects. [ 14 ] Tumour heterogeneity also affects response to treatment. [ 16 ] The key to extracting the benefits of ICT may be meticulous patient and tumour selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%