2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00332-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival, growth, and growth allocation of planted Scots pine trees after different levels of biomass removal in clear-felling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
66
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
66
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Carr) during 2 years was about 33 percent less with complete residue removal than with bole-only harvest (Proe and Dutch 1994). Impacts on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth associated with whole-tree harvesting did not become apparent until several years after harvest on an N-limited site in Sweden (Egnell and Valinger 2003). Biomass removals were most detrimental to tree growth on aspen sites in the Lake States when 10-year study results were summarized for 26 of the oldest installations of the Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) network sites (Powers et al 2005).…”
Section: Biomass Removal Impactsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carr) during 2 years was about 33 percent less with complete residue removal than with bole-only harvest (Proe and Dutch 1994). Impacts on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth associated with whole-tree harvesting did not become apparent until several years after harvest on an N-limited site in Sweden (Egnell and Valinger 2003). Biomass removals were most detrimental to tree growth on aspen sites in the Lake States when 10-year study results were summarized for 26 of the oldest installations of the Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) network sites (Powers et al 2005).…”
Section: Biomass Removal Impactsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Whole-tree harvesting removes more nutrients from the site than conventional harvesting (Boyle 1976, Egnell and Valinger 2003, Freedman et al 1981, Weetman and Webber 1972. Slash reduction and site preparation treatments such as piling and broadcast burning also affect site nutrient stores and microsite climate.…”
Section: Biomass Removal Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier results, both from modelling (Rolff andÅgren 1999, Peng et al 2002) and empirical studies (Egnell and Valinger 2003) supports this conclusion. This feedback mechanism from soil nutrient status to forest growth, even though widely studied, still requires further analysis to provide a common understanding of the effects of biomass extraction on it.…”
Section: Effects Of Intensified Biomass Extraction On Forest Carbon Bmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The treatments are: 1) stem-only thinning (SOT), 2) whole-tree thinning (WTT), 3) WTT + NPK compensation fertilisation, 4) SOT + 150 kg N + 30 kg P/ha, and 5) WTT + 150 kg N + 30 kg P/ha. The data are available at http://www.skogforsk.no/feltforsok/Langfig.cfm?Fnr=1057 (in Norwegian) Egnell and Valinger (2003) also found reduced growth in a Scots pine stand 24 years after WTH as well as branch and stem harvest (BSH). Comparable results have been found in the UK by Proe and Dutch (1994) in second generation Sitka spruce after clear-cutting including removal of residues.…”
Section: Effects Of Harvesting Intensity On Forest Regeneration and Pmentioning
confidence: 99%