1987
DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.37.5.258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival Experience in The Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 215 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relatively stable ASIR in Jamaica over the past decade, with an ASIR of 40.1 per 100 000 in the previous Jamaica Cancer Registry report (Gibson et al, 2008), is not in keeping with the increasing incidence of breast cancer in other countries, attributed to screening mammography (Richardson et al, 2005). In populations that receive regular screening mammography, the percentage of patients with locally advanced disease is less than 5% (Seidman et al, 1987). Approximately 30% of our patients had Stage III disease, reflecting the inadequacy of national programmes for early breast cancer detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The relatively stable ASIR in Jamaica over the past decade, with an ASIR of 40.1 per 100 000 in the previous Jamaica Cancer Registry report (Gibson et al, 2008), is not in keeping with the increasing incidence of breast cancer in other countries, attributed to screening mammography (Richardson et al, 2005). In populations that receive regular screening mammography, the percentage of patients with locally advanced disease is less than 5% (Seidman et al, 1987). Approximately 30% of our patients had Stage III disease, reflecting the inadequacy of national programmes for early breast cancer detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Firstly, mammographic screening, which allows detection of earlier lesions, is under-utilized in our population. In populations that receive regular screening mammography, the percentage of patients with locally advanced disease is less than 5% (Seidman et al, 1987). Very few women in our review had mammographically detected tumors; in fact, most had tumours that were large enough to allow self-detection (median size 3.5cm).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…23 While reported results suggest an overall benefit associated with screening, 24,25 to our knowledge, there are no published reports that detail race-specific findings.…”
Section: Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 97%