2014
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/not316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival effect of first- and second-line treatments for patients with primary glioblastoma: a cohort study from a prospective registry, 1997-2010

Abstract: We found a significant increase in overall survival, PFS, and survival after recurrence after 2004, likely due to improvements in surgical techniques, introduction of the Stupp protocol as a first-line treatment, and new standard protocols for second-line chemotherapy and radiosurgery after tumor recurrence. In both cohorts, reoperation after tumor recurrence did not improve survival.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared our data with the analysis of “Cohort II” from a retrospective analysis of therapy response performed by Nava et al [29]. Cohort II was composed of 746 patients with histologically confirmed primary GB who were diagnosed and treated with the Stupp protocol [1] as a firstline treatment, and new standard protocols for second-line chemotherapy and radiosurgery after tumor recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared our data with the analysis of “Cohort II” from a retrospective analysis of therapy response performed by Nava et al [29]. Cohort II was composed of 746 patients with histologically confirmed primary GB who were diagnosed and treated with the Stupp protocol [1] as a firstline treatment, and new standard protocols for second-line chemotherapy and radiosurgery after tumor recurrence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prospective registry study of 764 patients with glioblastoma analyzed over a 7-year period (2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010) with one third of patients reoperated at recurrence did not suggest a benefit of repeat surgery (HR 1.02), however, no detailed patient stratification for prognostic variables was available [28]. Similarly, in a meta-analysis of 8 prospective phase I and II trials comprising 300 patients with recurrent glioblastoma repeat surgery was not an independent predictor for PFS and OS [29].…”
Section: Surgery At Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current options include further surgery, second line chemotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery [24]. Therefore, there is a clear need to identify novel therapeutic approaches to improve outcomes [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%