2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00175-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival, dispersal, and home-range establishment of reintroduced captive-bred puaiohi, Myadestes palmeri

Abstract: We monitored the survival, dispersal, and home-range establishment of captive-bred, reintroduced puaiohi Myadestes palmeri, a critically endangered thrush endemic to the island of Kauai. Fourteen captive-bred, juvenile birds were released from hacktowers in January-February 1999 and monitored for 8-10 weeks using radiotelemetry. All 14 birds (100%) survived to 56 days post-release. Two birds (14.3%) dispersed greater than 3 km from release site within 1 day of release. The remaining birds settled within 1 week… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
51
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, post-release monitoring could enhance preexisting models by honing parameter precision and variance estimates, recognizing and correcting biases, and including stochastic and density dependent algorithms. Our model might be employed in exactly such a way during the reintroduction of T. c. cinnamominus to its native habitats on Guam (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2004), or during the translocation of T. gambieri from Niau to another island in the Tuamotu archipelago, and similar approaches could be used for many other groups (Thibault et al, 2002;Tweed et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, post-release monitoring could enhance preexisting models by honing parameter precision and variance estimates, recognizing and correcting biases, and including stochastic and density dependent algorithms. Our model might be employed in exactly such a way during the reintroduction of T. c. cinnamominus to its native habitats on Guam (US Fish and Wildlife Service, 2004), or during the translocation of T. gambieri from Niau to another island in the Tuamotu archipelago, and similar approaches could be used for many other groups (Thibault et al, 2002;Tweed et al, 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast to our prediction that individuals would actively search widely through the environment before choosing to settle, thus exhibiting a decrease in search area over time. Indeed, translocated individuals, particularly birds, often display high rates of relatively immediate dispersal away from the release site [20], [66], [72], [73]. The relationship we observed between search area and week is not frequently reported and may be a result of releasing birds in social groups with familiar group members [74], or initial caution by individuals due to the translocation or inexperience in an unfamiliar environment [75], [76], followed by more active search for habitat, and then eventual settlement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the non-breeding status of the Poo´uli changes upon initiation of breeding activity, it's home range size may become reduced, as has been documented for the Hawaii Creeper and Puaiohi (VanderWerf 1998;Tweed et al 2003). Telemetry of released Puaiohi revealed a temporary home range derived of 7.90 ha from kernel analyses (vs. a breeding home range of 1.20 ha), which is compatible with the kernel estimate of 8.44 for Poo´uli, and supports the idea that the three Poo´uli may currently be occupying non-breeding home ranges, in line with their known non-breeding status.…”
Section: Home Range Size and Feeding Ecologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, the Poo´uli individuals appear to be unusual in that field efforts have repeatedly relocated them all since 1995 (Baker 2001), whereas historical sightings of the Maui Nukupu'u (Hemignathus lucidus affinis), Maui 'Akepa (Loxops coccineus ochraceus), Kaua'i Nukupu'u (Hemignathus lucidus hanapepe), and Ó u( Psittirostra psittacea) could not be repeated during subsequent visits (Reynolds and Snetsinger 2001;Groombridge et al 2004a). Third, current recovery efforts now involve the removal to captivity of the last remaining individuals as a last ditch effort to save this species from extinction, so the next opportunity to study their natural movement patterns will rely on successful restoration of the wild population through captive propagation (Tweed et al 2003;VanderWerf et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%