2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05965-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and recurrence after concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for cancer of the uterine cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
392
1
16

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 985 publications
(423 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
14
392
1
16
Order By: Relevance
“…These IR-specific signatures would be used for an important discriminator of stress-response against other types of DNA damage. In addition, our data demonstrates that the mechanisms of cellular responses to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiotherapy are independent, which might support well-known synergistic effects of the combined chemo-and radiotherapy in advanced malignancies (Green et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…These IR-specific signatures would be used for an important discriminator of stress-response against other types of DNA damage. In addition, our data demonstrates that the mechanisms of cellular responses to chemotherapeutic drugs and radiotherapy are independent, which might support well-known synergistic effects of the combined chemo-and radiotherapy in advanced malignancies (Green et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In fact, our data in this regard are comparable with those of much larger series where patients were treated with chemo-radiotherapy as analyzed recently by Green, et al [21][22]. By way of example, for early-stage and locally advanced disease, the five-year rates of central pelvic disease control were 94% and 87%, respectively, in the analysis by Katz and Eifel [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A recent meta-analysis of treatments with concurrent chemo- and radiotherapy showed a greater beneficial effect with improvements in PFS and OS in studies that included a high proportion of stage I/II patients. However, caution was advised in extrapolating the results to patients with advanced disease stage [11]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%