2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00537-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and precopulatory behaviour of Gammarus pulex (L.) exposed to two xenoestrogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
40
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
40
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the lack of statistically significant differences between the solvent control and the concentration of 50 ng·L -1 , it can be assumed that ethanol also affect the behaviour to a small extent. Watts et al [9] conducted a similar research on Gammarus pulex. They checked the Indirect Separation Time (IST50) and the Re-pairing Time (RT50) under EE2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the lack of statistically significant differences between the solvent control and the concentration of 50 ng·L -1 , it can be assumed that ethanol also affect the behaviour to a small extent. Watts et al [9] conducted a similar research on Gammarus pulex. They checked the Indirect Separation Time (IST50) and the Re-pairing Time (RT50) under EE2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the behaviour may indicate a change in the environmental conditions [26]. The effect of contamination on the animal behaviour can be reflected in the impact on the locomotion [27], feeding, ventilation [28] and reproductive activity like precopula mating and separation [9]. The precopulatory behaviours have a considerable ecological significance because they are crucial for the mating success [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this group different behavioral endpoints have been studied, such as alterations in swimming activity, ventilation, foraging and predator avoidance, pollution avoidance, and reproductive behavior (Watts et al 2001;Wallace and Estephan 2004;Riddell et al 2005;De Lange et al 2006a, b;Gerhardt 2007b). Although most of them have shown higher sensitivity to different toxicants than traditional acute bioassays, behavioral endpoints are not used for regulatory uses or for a probabilistic risk assessment of toxicants, as they are considered less standardized than traditional bioassays (with mortality, growth, and reproduction as endpoints) (Scott and Sloman 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%