2020
DOI: 10.1177/2043820620930833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and liveability in #COVIDtimes: Queer women’s transnational witnessing of COVID-19

Abstract: Exploring liveabilities as more than survival, this commentary underscores how survival remains important in these #COVIDtimes. Discussing our privileges and resistances as queer women with various intersectionalities, we offer transnational notes on negotiating, surviving, and living in these non-normative times.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Witnessing has returned to prominence, from survivor testimonies of #MeToo (Gilmore, 2019) and digital witnessing of racialised police violence (Richardson, 2020) to social media testimony of asylum seekers held in spaces of exception (Rae et al, 2018), critical witnessing of COVID‐19 (Browne et al, 2020), and the "geological self‐witnessing" of the so‐called Anthropocene (Yusoff, 2016, p. 5). Meanwhile, an interdisciplinary body of literature has theorised the complexities of the act and genre of witnessing (e.g Givoni, 2016; Pollin‐Galay, 2018; Trezise, 2014), which belie the seemingly straightforward representational logic of bringing something absent back to presence: as if witnessing were no more than memory retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Witnessing has returned to prominence, from survivor testimonies of #MeToo (Gilmore, 2019) and digital witnessing of racialised police violence (Richardson, 2020) to social media testimony of asylum seekers held in spaces of exception (Rae et al, 2018), critical witnessing of COVID‐19 (Browne et al, 2020), and the "geological self‐witnessing" of the so‐called Anthropocene (Yusoff, 2016, p. 5). Meanwhile, an interdisciplinary body of literature has theorised the complexities of the act and genre of witnessing (e.g Givoni, 2016; Pollin‐Galay, 2018; Trezise, 2014), which belie the seemingly straightforward representational logic of bringing something absent back to presence: as if witnessing were no more than memory retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%