2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11852-008-0036-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and growth of transplants of laboratory raised axenic seedlings of Enhalus acoroides (L.f.) Royle and field-collected plants of Syringodium isoetifolium (Aschers.) Dandy, Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb.) Aschers. and Halodule pinifolia (Miki) den Hartog

Abstract: Survival and growth of transplants of laboratory raised axenic seedlings of Enhalus acoroides (L.f.) Royle and field-collected plants of Syringodium isoetifolium (Aschers.) Dandy, Thalassia hemprichii (Ehrenb.) Aschers. and Halodule pinifolia (Miki) den Hartog Abstract Experimental transplantation investigations, using laboratory raised axenic seedlings of Enhalus acoroides and natural populations of Syringodium isoetifolium, Thalassia hemprichii and Halodule pinifolia in the Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere Re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in values between the natural vegetation plot and other methods is due to the fact that the seagrass in the natural vegetation plot does not need to adapt to environmental changes (substrate and water parameters), while the seagrass transplanted using the seedling method does (lowest growth rate values). This is consistent with Thangaradjou and Kannan (2008), who claimed that seagrass requires an adaptation period to its new habitat before growing normally in the early weeks. Hasanah (2014) also stated that old leaves grow slower than young leaves, which means that the seedling method had the lowest growth rate value, however, it had good growth.…”
Section: Growth Rate Of Enhalus Acoroidessupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference in values between the natural vegetation plot and other methods is due to the fact that the seagrass in the natural vegetation plot does not need to adapt to environmental changes (substrate and water parameters), while the seagrass transplanted using the seedling method does (lowest growth rate values). This is consistent with Thangaradjou and Kannan (2008), who claimed that seagrass requires an adaptation period to its new habitat before growing normally in the early weeks. Hasanah (2014) also stated that old leaves grow slower than young leaves, which means that the seedling method had the lowest growth rate value, however, it had good growth.…”
Section: Growth Rate Of Enhalus Acoroidessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Seagrass seedlings sown in the laboratory have thinner and smaller leaves than natural seagrass seedlings, owing to the natural sea providing nutrients compared to artificially produced seedling containers. The survival rate of seagrass E. acoroides in the seedling method was quite good in comparison to the research by Thangaradjou and Kannan (2008), which found that the same method achieved a survival rate of 29% in the seagrass species Ruppia maritime, and was not significantly different with the same method done by Hasanah (2014) at Baranglompo Island, i.e., 94%.…”
Section: Figure 6 Average Growth Rate (+Sd) Of Seagrass E Acoroidesmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Available literature has brought that 14% of seagrasses are at an elevated risk of extinction under IUCN red list of threatened species [86]. Though numerous studies have been addressed the in-vitro culture of seagrass [38,[87][88][89][90][91][92][93], no report exist on the metabolomics analysis from suspension cultured cells of seagrass. In-vitro propagation techniques of different seagrass species for restoration and protocol for seagrass protoplast isolation are prevailing [94][95][96][97][98].…”
Section: Seagrass Cell Suspension Culturementioning
confidence: 99%