2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and Functional Stability in Chronic Kidney Disease Due to Surgical Removal of Nephrons: Importance of the New Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
131
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
131
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As already verified by others [8], baseline medical conditions that may produce renal functional impairment remain the key and most informative causes of renal failure, regardless of all surgical efforts to preserve nephrons [9]. However, our findings also corroborate the beneficial effect of NSS for the consequences of a baseline medical condition favoring chronic kidney disease [9].…”
Section: E U R O P E a N U R O L O G Ysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As already verified by others [8], baseline medical conditions that may produce renal functional impairment remain the key and most informative causes of renal failure, regardless of all surgical efforts to preserve nephrons [9]. However, our findings also corroborate the beneficial effect of NSS for the consequences of a baseline medical condition favoring chronic kidney disease [9].…”
Section: E U R O P E a N U R O L O G Ysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A partial nephrectomy (PN) with preservation of nephrons is recommended in early-stage RCCs restricted to one kidney [2]. Notwithstanding the nephron-sparing effect of PN compared to radical nephrectomy, a postoperative impairment of renal function is common [3,4]. Despite its often transient nature, a clinically significant GFR decrease of 16–30% is observed in the first days following surgery [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-renal cancer mortality did not differ significantly in patients with no CKD and in those with CKD-S (HR 1.07 95% CI 0.86-1.32, p = 0.5). Interestingly, the new baseline GFR in CKD-S patients remained stable over time, whereas patients with CKD-M/S experienced progressive declines in GFR [14]. This study highlights two important aspects of the debate surrounding PN and RN.…”
Section: Does Pn Really Provide Durable Benefits In Long-term Renal Fmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, these data have led investigators to hypothesize that reductions in GFR from a nephrectomy for RCC may not correlate with worse clinical outcomes. Lane et al evaluated this by stratifying patients according to CKD status: no CKD, surgically-induced CKD (CKD-S), and preexisting medical renal disease prior to nephrectomy (CKD-M/S) [14]. Non-renal cancer mortality did not differ significantly in patients with no CKD and in those with CKD-S (HR 1.07 95% CI 0.86-1.32, p = 0.5).…”
Section: Does Pn Really Provide Durable Benefits In Long-term Renal Fmentioning
confidence: 99%