2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cretres.2012.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival and extinction of sex-determining mechanisms in Cretaceous tetrapods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of evidence of an effect of SDM on diversification contradicts the expectation that TSD species should be more vulnerable to extinction as climate change can drastically bias TSD sex ratios (Janzen ; Neuwald and Valenzuela ), as well as counter reports that TSD reptilian families suffered lower extinction rates than GSD families during the Cretaceous/Palaeogene transition (Silber et al. ; Escobedo‐Galvan and Gonzalez‐Salazar ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of evidence of an effect of SDM on diversification contradicts the expectation that TSD species should be more vulnerable to extinction as climate change can drastically bias TSD sex ratios (Janzen ; Neuwald and Valenzuela ), as well as counter reports that TSD reptilian families suffered lower extinction rates than GSD families during the Cretaceous/Palaeogene transition (Silber et al. ; Escobedo‐Galvan and Gonzalez‐Salazar ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings agree with previous family-level analysis of reptiles and birds, which detected no association between speciation rates and SDMs (Organ and Janes 2008), although it should be noted that their results could also be due to the lower power of family-level analyses (Organ and Janes 2008) and the fact that their study combined a family-level tree with a model that assumes complete sampling (Organ and Janes 2008). The lack of evidence of an effect of SDM on diversification contradicts the expectation that TSD species should be more vulnerable to extinction as climate change can drastically bias TSD sex ratios (Janzen 1994;Neuwald and Valenzuela 2011), as well as counter reports that TSD reptilian families suffered lower extinction rates than GSD families during the Cretaceous/Palaeogene transition (Silber et al 2011;Escobedo-Galvan and Gonzalez-Salazar 2012).…”
Section: Sdm and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent literature highlights the potential impact of anthropogenically‐driven climate change effects on species with temperature dependent sex determination (TSD), a form of environmental sex determination (ESD). Predicted effects on a variety of reptiles range from increased extinction risk caused by an extreme skewing of sex ratios (Janzen, ; Miller et al, ; Nelson et al, ; Mitchell et al, ; Pintus et al, ; Kallimanis, ; Mitchell and Janzen, ; Escobedo‐Galván and González‐Salazar, ; Woolgar et al, ) to more optimistic expectations of resiliency (Warner and Shine, ; Hulin et al, ; Kallimanis, ; Silber et al, ; Marcovaldi et al, ). The lack of agreement suggests that the quality and scope of available data, as well as the analytical approaches used, may leave much to be desired!…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incubation temperatures exceeding this range in either direction, colder or warmer, may cause the development of only one sex and ultimately skewed sex ratios in populations. In previous studies, authors assume that sex-determining mechanisms may strongly affect the survival probability of a species in a geological time frame [131]. Recently, there is a considerable debate about how the impact of human-induced climate changes might affect species with TSD [132][133], and some studies underline that climate change might jeopardize sex ratios and therefore cause severe population decline and extinction [134].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%