2019
DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival Analysis of Cancer Patients in North Eastern Nigeria from 2004 – 2017 – A Kaplan - Meier Method

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Cancer is a deadly malignant disease and is prevalent in Sub Saharan Africa. The North East part of Nigeria in particular and the country, in general, are struggling to cope with the increasing burden of cancer and other communicable and non-communicable diseases. The situation is worsened by the ongoing insurgency and terrorist activities in the area. AIM: The aim of this paper is to present the research findings from a cohort study aimed at the analysis of the estimation of the survivorship… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Probability of survival among the HIV positive and HIV negative cohorts was not significantly different (Pr = 0.072). This is contrary to most reports on mortality after cancer diagnosis which showed higher mortality among HIV seropositive cancer patients than their HIV sero-negative counterparts (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). In a study on the contribution of HIV infection to mortality among cancer patients in Uganda, a more than 2-fold increased risk of death among the HIV-infected cancer patients compared to HIVuninfected cancer patients was reported.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Probability of survival among the HIV positive and HIV negative cohorts was not significantly different (Pr = 0.072). This is contrary to most reports on mortality after cancer diagnosis which showed higher mortality among HIV seropositive cancer patients than their HIV sero-negative counterparts (16)(17)(18)(19)(20). In a study on the contribution of HIV infection to mortality among cancer patients in Uganda, a more than 2-fold increased risk of death among the HIV-infected cancer patients compared to HIVuninfected cancer patients was reported.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…In this 2-year retrospective cohort study, the significant proportion of cancer patients observed with unknown HIV status 371 (35.6%) could be attributed to the fact that testing for HIV status of cancer patients was not considered as a standard of care in the management of cancer patients in the various health institutions in our setting. It is now being advocated that healthcare providers should request for HIV testing for all cancer patients being managed as HIV has been well-documented to have a significant impact on ultimate survival outcomes of cancer patients (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). All those cases identified in this study with known HIV status had indicated their status in the course of cancer care and recorded in the registry as such.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of numerous studies places undue restrictions on the use of different statistical techniques. The statistical techniques are needed to reveal hidden patterns as long as the sample size is appreciably high [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28]. The 7 articles were analysed using Minitab version 17.0, binary logistic regression was used for the analysis, and this was as a result of splitting of the target groups into two distinct and non-overlapping classes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, YouTube has been helpful in recruiting patients for medical research, peer support, advancing patient loyalty, patient health education, modulating patient attitude and patient empowerment. Others are publicizing current research on medical issues, including treatment options and creating awareness on some health-related issues [82][83][84][85] Descriptive statistics were useful in discerning patterns in the study, which has been applied to these few selected works [86][87][88]. The present research corroborates similar findings on the evaluation of online contents [89][90][91] The assessment of the quality of medical information for patient education available on YouTube has been a subject of intense debate [92][93][94][95], and this review has succeeded in categorizing the views into groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%