1991
DOI: 10.1016/0305-0483(91)90015-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival analysis as a tool for company failure prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
73
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
73
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…discriminant analysis, logit and probit regressions, survival analysis) (for further details see Balcaen and Ooghe (2006), Gepp and Kumar (2012)). When survival analysis is applied in this context (see for example Gepp and Kumar (2008), Luoma and Laitinen (1991)), right censoring and truncation have been considered in only few papers (Bhattacharjee et al 2009) in the univariate case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…discriminant analysis, logit and probit regressions, survival analysis) (for further details see Balcaen and Ooghe (2006), Gepp and Kumar (2012)). When survival analysis is applied in this context (see for example Gepp and Kumar (2008), Luoma and Laitinen (1991)), right censoring and truncation have been considered in only few papers (Bhattacharjee et al 2009) in the univariate case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival analysis comes from the medical research (as the name indicated) but is also used in other studies [13], [14], [15], [16]. Characteristic for this analysis are the so-called censored data.…”
Section: The Comparison Of the Analysis Of Survival For Simulated Supmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portioning, while Gupta et al [20] use mathematical programming as an alternative to multivariate discriminate analysis for system failure prediction problem. Other methods used were survival analysis by Luoma, Laitinenl [21] which is a tool for company failure prediction, expert systems by Messier and Hansen [22] , neural network by Altman.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%