2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Implications for decision making

Abstract: To optimize survival, earlier aortic valve replacement should be considered even in asymptomatic patients before severe left ventricular hypertrophy or dysfunction develops. In younger patients, the largest possible prosthesis should be implanted to minimize residual gradient; in elderly patients, complex operations just to insert larger prostheses should be avoided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
109
3
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
109
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Mihaljevic et al [8] showed that, two years after aortic valve replacement, elderly patients have survival similar to that of the general population, matched for age, race and gender (85% survival at 2 years and 65% at 5 years for group of patients over 80 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, Mihaljevic et al [8] showed that, two years after aortic valve replacement, elderly patients have survival similar to that of the general population, matched for age, race and gender (85% survival at 2 years and 65% at 5 years for group of patients over 80 years).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Recent studies have shown that although the postoperative morbidity is higher in patients over 80 years, the late postoperative mortality is similar to younger patients, with 2-year survival comparable to that of the general population, matched for age and gender [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Numerous observational studies have consistently demonstrated that corrective surgery in symptomatic patients is invariably followed by a subjective improvement in quality of life and a substantial increase in survival rates. In addition, AVR may also provide survival benefit for selected asymptomatic patients, when compared to conservative management [10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The 2012 update of the ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease also states that aortic valve replacement may be considered for asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis and abnormal response to exercise [17].…”
Section: Treatment Of Valvular Aortic Stenosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean length of hospital stay was 11 days [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. 30 day-mortality rate was 3.5%.…”
Section: Own Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are certain groups of patients who are denied surgery because of high risk of operative mortality [4]. Particularly, older age and left ventricular dysfunction have been related to high operative risk and poor outcome after aortic valve replacement [5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%