2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.08.362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survival after surgery for oral cancer: a 30-year experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
43
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
5
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the studies claimed that prognosis at a young age was similar (Blanchard et al, ; de Morais et al, ; Farquhar et al, ; Martinez et al, ), worse (Zhang et al, ), or better (Sommers et al, ) compared to that of older patients. We found that male gender was associated with a poorer prognosis, which was in accordance with previous studies (Ong, Murphy, Smith, Kanatas, & Mitchell, ; Santos et al, ). However, when we analyzed the demographic data in the context of CAF density, a clear trend of subclassification of the patients could be performed in terms of clinical outcomes, namely that male patients with high CAF density had a better prognosis than female patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Some of the studies claimed that prognosis at a young age was similar (Blanchard et al, ; de Morais et al, ; Farquhar et al, ; Martinez et al, ), worse (Zhang et al, ), or better (Sommers et al, ) compared to that of older patients. We found that male gender was associated with a poorer prognosis, which was in accordance with previous studies (Ong, Murphy, Smith, Kanatas, & Mitchell, ; Santos et al, ). However, when we analyzed the demographic data in the context of CAF density, a clear trend of subclassification of the patients could be performed in terms of clinical outcomes, namely that male patients with high CAF density had a better prognosis than female patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The 5‐year OS rate of our patient population was 81%. This value is higher as most survival rates described by other authors, which range between 41% and 70% (Bloebaum, Poort, Böckmann, & Kessler, 2014; Gil et al., 2009; González‐García et al., 2009; Jardim, Francisco, Gondak, Damascena, & Kowalski, 2015; Ong, Murphy, Smith, Kanatas, & Mitchell, 2017; Rogers et al., 2009; Wong et al., 2012; Zanoni et al., 2019). The 5‐year DFS and 5‐year LRC rate were 66% and 75%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Furthermore, the T‐ and the N‐classification are very strong prognosticators for OS in both the uni‐ and multivariate analysis. They also significantly influence DFS and LRC (Caldeira, Soto, de Aguiar, & Martins, 2019; Carrillo et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2016; DeConde et al., 2012; Gil et al., 2009; Jardim et al., 2015; Mizrachi et al., 2018; Ong et al., 2017; Rogers et al., 2009; Shinn et al., 2018; Wong et al., 2012; Zanoni et al., 2019). Larger primary tumours are, especially when infiltrating the adjacent tissue and particularly in case of bone invasion, associated with a worse prognosis (Wong et al., 2012; Woolgar, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although diagnostic and therapeutic modalities have improved, the prognosis of patients with advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) still remains relatively poor, with 5-year survival rates of approximately 50%. 1 The poor prognosis is mainly due to the lack of early detection of OSCC, the high incidence of metastasis/recurrence after surgery, and the chemoresistance of OSCC. 2 , 3 A new optical imaging method capable of sensitively and specifically detecting OSCC must be developed to improve the prognosis of OSCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%