Abstract:BACKGROUND: Although a role for resection of solitary metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been described, the utility of surgery in patients with multiple sites of disease has been less well defined. The authors report the survival of patients who underwent complete metastasectomy for multiple RCC metastases. METHODS: The authors identified 887 patients who underwent nephrectomy for RCC between 1976 and 2006 who developed multiple metastatic lesions. The impact of complete metastasectomy on survival… Show more
“…We also acknowledge that there are biological differences between subjects with distant metastases who undergo metastasectomy and subjects ineligible for metastasectomy. Patients with high-volume disease, rapid progression or poor performance status are less likely to undergo metastasectomy [35,36]. Conversely, the presence of pancreatic metastases in RCC is associated with a more indolent clinical course [37].…”
Background: The majority of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) studies analyze primary tumors, and the corresponding results are extrapolated to metastatic RCC tumors. However, it is unknown if gene expression profiles from primary RCC tumors differs from patient-matched metastatic tumors. Thus, we sought to identify differentially expressed genes between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of RCC metastases.
Patients and methods:We compared gene expression profiles between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors using a two-stage design. First, we used Affymetrix microarrays on 15 pairs of primary RCC [14 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 1 papillary] tumors and patient-matched pulmonary metastases. Second, we used a custom NanoString panel to validate seven candidate genes in an independent cohort of 114 ccRCC patients. Differential gene expression was evaluated using a mixed effect linear model; a random effect denoting patient was included to account for the paired data. Third, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were used to evaluate associations with metastasis-free and overall survival in primary ccRCC tumors.Results: We identified and validated up regulation of seven genes functionally involved in the formation of the extracellular matrix (ECM): DCN, SLIT2, LUM, LAMA2, ADAMTS12, CEACAM6 and LMO3. In primary ccRCC, CEACAM6 and LUM were significantly associated with metastasis-free and overall survival (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:We evaluated gene expression profiles using the largest set to date, to our knowledge, of patient-matched primary and metastatic ccRCC tumors and identified up regulation of ECM genes in metastases. Our study implicates up regulation of ECM genes as a critical molecular event leading to visceral, bone and soft tissue metastases in ccRCC.
“…We also acknowledge that there are biological differences between subjects with distant metastases who undergo metastasectomy and subjects ineligible for metastasectomy. Patients with high-volume disease, rapid progression or poor performance status are less likely to undergo metastasectomy [35,36]. Conversely, the presence of pancreatic metastases in RCC is associated with a more indolent clinical course [37].…”
Background: The majority of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) studies analyze primary tumors, and the corresponding results are extrapolated to metastatic RCC tumors. However, it is unknown if gene expression profiles from primary RCC tumors differs from patient-matched metastatic tumors. Thus, we sought to identify differentially expressed genes between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors in order to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying the development of RCC metastases.
Patients and methods:We compared gene expression profiles between patient-matched primary and metastatic RCC tumors using a two-stage design. First, we used Affymetrix microarrays on 15 pairs of primary RCC [14 clear cell RCC (ccRCC), 1 papillary] tumors and patient-matched pulmonary metastases. Second, we used a custom NanoString panel to validate seven candidate genes in an independent cohort of 114 ccRCC patients. Differential gene expression was evaluated using a mixed effect linear model; a random effect denoting patient was included to account for the paired data. Third, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data were used to evaluate associations with metastasis-free and overall survival in primary ccRCC tumors.Results: We identified and validated up regulation of seven genes functionally involved in the formation of the extracellular matrix (ECM): DCN, SLIT2, LUM, LAMA2, ADAMTS12, CEACAM6 and LMO3. In primary ccRCC, CEACAM6 and LUM were significantly associated with metastasis-free and overall survival (P < 0.01).
Conclusions:We evaluated gene expression profiles using the largest set to date, to our knowledge, of patient-matched primary and metastatic ccRCC tumors and identified up regulation of ECM genes in metastases. Our study implicates up regulation of ECM genes as a critical molecular event leading to visceral, bone and soft tissue metastases in ccRCC.
“…All studies were retrospective and non-randomised, leading to the high risk of bias associated with non-randomisation, patient attrition, and selective reporting. With the exception of one study, 12 all studies were substantially underpowered. Regarding confounding, about half of studies reported adequate data on age and sex.…”
Section: Local Therapies For Brain Metastasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No randomised controlled trials or prospective non-randomised comparative studies were identifi ed. Eight studies assessed local treatments of metastases from renal cell carcinoma in various organs, 12,24,26,27,[29][30][31][32] of which the most common sites were lung, bone, liver, and brain, and less common sites were pancreas, adrenal gland, lymph nodes, thyroid gland, spleen, ethmoid sinus, and skin (table 1). Other studies also assessed local treatments for metastases from renal cell carcinoma in bone (including the vertebrae), 33 29 used treatment beforehand.…”
Section: Review Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the eight studies 12,24,26,27,[29][30][31][32] that assessed metastases from renal cell carcinoma in various organs reported on complete metastasectomy versus no metastasectomy, incomplete metastasectomy, or both (table 2). However, in one study, 32 complete resection was achieved in only 45% of the metastasectomy group, which was compared with patients with no metastasectomy.…”
Section: Complete Versus No or Incomplete Metastasectomymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 Surgical resection is a possible treatment for these metastases, but metastases' accessibility and resectability, and patients' performance and comorbidities have to be taken into account. 12 Radiotherapy modalities can provide valid local noninvasive treatment alternatives to surgery. For brain metastases, these include whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).…”
Local treatment of metastases such as metastasectomy or radiotherapy remains controversial in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma. To investigate the benefi ts and harms of various local treatments, we did a systematic review of all types of comparative studies on local treatment of metastases from renal cell carcinoma in any organ. Interventions included metastasectomy, radiotherapy modalities, and no local treatment. The results suggest that patients treated with complete metastasectomy have better survival and symptom control (including pain relief in bone metastases) than those treated with either incomplete or no metastasectomy. Nevertheless, the available evidence was marred by high risks of bias and confounding across all studies. Although the fi ndings presented here should be interpreted with caution, they and the identifi ed gaps in knowledge should provide guidance for clinicians and researchers, and directions for further research.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.