1With the advent of flexgrid optical networks, the rigid wavelength-division multiplexing (WDM) technology will be enhanced by providing better spectrum efficiency and flexibility. In those future flexible optical networks, optical connections (lightpaths) can allocate a flexible number of spectrum slices, also known as frequency slots, so to match better with its requested bitrate. In this paper, we propose to take advantage of this flexible spectrum allocation in recovery mechanisms to be triggered when a failure occurs to provide recovery of part of the requested bitrate, i.e. the allocated spectrum by backup lightpaths could be lower than that of the working lightpaths provided that client service level agreements are fulfilled. This reduction in the recovered bitrate (bitrate squeezing) allows optimizing the use of network capacity. We propose path-based recovery alternatives, based on protection and restoration, specially designed for flexgrid networks. The performance of the proposed recovery mechanisms is exhaustively evaluated on a national reference network. Keywords: Flexgrid Optical Networks, Bitrate squeezed recovery, Network Optimization.
INTRODUCTIONFuture flexgrid optical networks featuring flexible and elastic spectrum allocation [1], [2] are attracting high interest from network operators and the research community in general as a result of its higher spectrum efficiency and flexibility with respect to wavelength switched optical networks (WSON) [3], based on the wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) technology. In flexgrid optical networks, the available optical spectrum is divided into frequency slots of fixed spectrum width, e.g. 25GHz or 12.5GHz. Optical connections (lightpaths) can use a variable number of these slots, which is a function of the requested bitrate, the modulation format used, and the slot width.Owing to the huge bitrate associated to each established path, recovery schemes need to be used to guarantee that the associated client connectivity demand continue being served even in case of failures [4]. As in WSON, recovery can be provided by either protection, where the failed working path is substituted by a pre-assigned backup one, or restoration, which is based on rerouting the working path. Backup lightpaths use resources, i.e. each of the frequency slots in a fiber link, that are dedicated to protect a single working path, or they can be shared to provide protection to multiple working lightpaths. As a consequence, the former scheme is called dedicated path protection (DPP) and the latter shared path protection (SPP).Although protection schemes reserve resources to guarantee that all protected lightpaths are recovered in case of any single failure, SPP provides better resource utilization than DPP due to spare resources are shared among several working lightpaths. On the other hand, restoration is the most efficient scheme since resources are only allocated after a failure impacts a working path and, for this very reason, no guarantees of recovery are given in dy...