Surveys in Surgical Education: A Systematic Review and Reporting Guideline

Abstract

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Survey studies are a commonly used method for data collection in surgical education research. Nevertheless, studies investigating survey design and response rates in surgical education research are lacking. The aim of this study was to gain an insight into survey response rates among surgical residents and medical students, and provide an initial reporting guideline for future survey studies in this field. <b><i>Design:</i></b> PubMed (MEDLINE) was systematically searched for survey studies in surgical education from January 2007 until February 2020, according to the PRISMA statements checklist. Study selection was conducted by 2 authors, independently. Surveys directed at surgical residents and/or medical students were included if data on response rates was available. Studies reporting solely from nonsurgical fields of medicine, paramedicine, or nursing were excluded. Subgroup analyses were performed, comparing response rates for varying modes of survey, per country, and for the 10 journals with the most identified surveys. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From the 5,693 records screened for a larger surgical survey database, a total of 312 surveys were included; 173 studies focused on surgical residents and 139 on medical students. The mean (SD) response rate was 55.7% (24.7%) for surgical residents and 69.0% (20.8%) for medical students. The number of published surveys increased yearly, mostly driven by an increase in surgical resident surveys. Although most surveys were Web-based (<i>n</i> = 166, 53.2%), this survey mode resulted in the lowest response rates (mean 52.6%). The highest response rates, with a mean of 79.8% (13.1%), were seen in in-person surveys (<i>n</i> = 89, 28.5%). Wide variations in response rates were seen between different countries and journals. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Web-based surveys are gaining popularity for medical research in general and for surgical education specifically; however, this mode results in lower response rates than those of in-person surveys. The response rate of in-person surveys is especially high when focusing on medical students. To improve reporting of survey studies, we present the first step towards a reporting guideline.

There is a need for a paradigm shift in laparoscopic surgical training: results of a nationwide survey among teaching hospitals in Switzerland

“…This is the first comprehensive survey to assess the surgical education landscape in Switzerland with a focus on laparoscopic surgery. The overall response rate of 56% is comparable to the response rates in a recently published systematic review by Banning et al [ 23 ] on surveys in surgical education (59.4% for e-mail surveys).…”

Investigating the drivers for antibiotic use and misuse amongst medical undergraduates–perspectives from a Sri Lankan medical school

“…This cross-sectional study was aimed at identifying the current practices leading to antibiotic misuse and drivers for antibiotic misuse among medical undergraduates of a Sri Lankan University. We had response rates that are comparable and alike to those reported elsewhere on medical students and doctor [4].…”

Expectations versus reality: Understanding the accuracy of impressions made during virtual interviews of pediatric pulmonary fellowship programs

“…Our results may be less generalizable to applicants who had a virtual‐only interview experience. The results are still usable when compared to several recent studies, which indicate that web‐based surveys on average obtain a 35%–55% response rate 25–27 . Second, we did not get survey responses from trainees in each pediatric pulmonary fellowship program.…”