2012
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveying the epigenomic landscape, one base at a time

Abstract: Epigenomics, the determination of epigenetic landscapes on a genome-wide scale, has progressed at an astounding rate over the past decade. Recent technological developments have enabled base-pair resolution of various epigenomic features, leading to new insights into epigenetic regulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the independently sorted untreated control and 40 min post-HSKT samples we do not observe this coupling of TSS-flanking nucleosome sensitivity and regulatory factor occupancy, which further suggests that the chromatin signature at the 20 min post-HKST indicates an early genomic response to HKST ( Figure 3B). The presence of sensitive nucleosomes flanking TF binding sites (TFBS) is concordant with similar results from plants and yeast (Zentner and Henikoff 2012;Vera et al, 2014;Pass et al, 2017). These results are consistent with a model in which nucleosomes that provide access to regulatory factor binding sites necessary for a specific genomic response will be more mobile and this will be reflected in greater sensitivity to digestion by MNase.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Tss-flanking Nucleosomes Is Associated With Tsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…However, in the independently sorted untreated control and 40 min post-HSKT samples we do not observe this coupling of TSS-flanking nucleosome sensitivity and regulatory factor occupancy, which further suggests that the chromatin signature at the 20 min post-HKST indicates an early genomic response to HKST ( Figure 3B). The presence of sensitive nucleosomes flanking TF binding sites (TFBS) is concordant with similar results from plants and yeast (Zentner and Henikoff 2012;Vera et al, 2014;Pass et al, 2017). These results are consistent with a model in which nucleosomes that provide access to regulatory factor binding sites necessary for a specific genomic response will be more mobile and this will be reflected in greater sensitivity to digestion by MNase.…”
Section: Sensitivity Of Tss-flanking Nucleosomes Is Associated With Tsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In this way, plotting the fragment sizes over genomic position relative to a binding site reveals a characteristic V shape if the binding site is occupied (for further description of V-plots, see Supplemental Fig. S6; Henikoff et al, 2011;Zentner and Henikoff, 2012). For both G-boxes in binding pattern 1 and binding pattern 2, we see a strong V pattern suggestive of in vivo occupancy (Fig.…”
Section: Results Bzip Homodimers Only Bind To a Subset Of Perfect G-bmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Differential MNase-seq revealed a number of genomic regions detectable only under light digest conditions [3,4] and occupied by either transcription factors or nucleosomes with conformations making linker DNA more accessible. We detected an abundance of MSFs in the proximal regulatory regions, where the levels of chromatin accessibility showed a positive correlation with gene expression [1,3,54,55] and were predictive of the unbalanced expression levels among the duplicated homoeologs, supporting the results of chromatin accessibility studies conducted using the DNaseseq and ATAC-seq approaches in wheat [18,29]. However, the majority of MSF (67%) identified in our study were located in the TE-rich intergenic regions, with an average distance of 137 kb from the closest gene, and overlapped with annotated TEs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%