Abstract:The threat to global food security of stagnating yields and population growth makes increasing crop productivity a critical goal over the coming decades. One key target for improving crop productivity and yields is increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis. Central to photosynthesis is Rubisco, which is a critical but often rate-limiting component. Here, we present full Rubisco catalytic properties measured at three temperatures for 75 plants species representing both crops and undomesticated plants from div… Show more
“…The most commonly used “standard” Rubisco kinetics and temperature functions are those for tobacco as obtained by Bernacchi et al (2002). However, it is well documented that significant differences occur among species in Rubisco kinetics (e.g., Galmés et al, 2005, 2015; Savir et al, 2010; Orr et al, 2016; Prins et al, 2016), and these differences result in significant bias in model parameterization (Walker et al, 2013). These authors also indicate that in vitro Rubisco kinetics may not accurately describe the operation of Rubisco under physiological conditions, due to degradation and/or inactivation of the enzyme during extraction or differences in the in vitro assay conditions compared to the chloroplast stroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, measuring in vitro kinetic constants of Rubisco is easier and less time consuming, so that a number of different species can be characterized in a reasonable time (Hermida-Carrera et al, 2016; Orr et al, 2016; Prins et al, 2016). Therefore, we propose using Γ * derived from in vitro S c/o measured in each species at different temperatures to first estimate g m and, then, parameterize photosynthesis from A N -C c curves using the species and temperature specific in vitro kinetics of Rubisco rather than “standard” values determined for model species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus strongly recommended that the use of “standard” Rubisco kinetics from tobacco is avoided when modeling photosynthesis in other species. As obtaining in vivo Rubisco kinetics for different species is not achievable in the short-term, we propose to use in vitro kinetics as determined by the methods explained here and elsewhere (Kane et al, 1994; Ruuska et al, 1998; Parry et al, 2007; Shay and Kubien, 2013; Perdomo, 2015; Galmés et al, 2016; Orr et al, 2016; Prins et al, 2016) as a first proxy for in vivo kinetics.…”
The impact of the combined effects of heat stress, increased vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and water deficit on the physiology of major crops needs to be better understood to help identifying the expected negative consequences of climate change and heat waves on global agricultural productivity. To address this issue, rice, wheat, and maize plants were grown under control temperature (CT, 25°C, VPD 1.8 kPa), and a high temperature (HT, 38°C, VPD 3.5 kPa), both under well-watered (WW) and water deficit (WD) conditions. Gas-exchange measurements showed that, in general, WD conditions affected the leaf conductance to CO2, while growth at HT had a more marked effect on the biochemistry of photosynthesis. When combined, HT and WD had an additive effect in limiting photosynthesis. The negative impacts of the imposed treatments on the processes governing leaf gas-exchange were species-dependent. Wheat presented a higher sensitivity while rice and maize showed a higher acclimation potential to increased temperature. Rubisco and PEPC kinetic constants determined in vitro at 25°C and 38°C were used to estimate Vcmax, Jmax, and Vpmax in the modeling of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. The results here obtained reiterate the need to use species-specific and temperature-specific values for Rubisco and PEPC kinetic constants for a precise parameterization of the photosynthetic response to changing environmental conditions in different crop species.
“…The most commonly used “standard” Rubisco kinetics and temperature functions are those for tobacco as obtained by Bernacchi et al (2002). However, it is well documented that significant differences occur among species in Rubisco kinetics (e.g., Galmés et al, 2005, 2015; Savir et al, 2010; Orr et al, 2016; Prins et al, 2016), and these differences result in significant bias in model parameterization (Walker et al, 2013). These authors also indicate that in vitro Rubisco kinetics may not accurately describe the operation of Rubisco under physiological conditions, due to degradation and/or inactivation of the enzyme during extraction or differences in the in vitro assay conditions compared to the chloroplast stroma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, measuring in vitro kinetic constants of Rubisco is easier and less time consuming, so that a number of different species can be characterized in a reasonable time (Hermida-Carrera et al, 2016; Orr et al, 2016; Prins et al, 2016). Therefore, we propose using Γ * derived from in vitro S c/o measured in each species at different temperatures to first estimate g m and, then, parameterize photosynthesis from A N -C c curves using the species and temperature specific in vitro kinetics of Rubisco rather than “standard” values determined for model species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is thus strongly recommended that the use of “standard” Rubisco kinetics from tobacco is avoided when modeling photosynthesis in other species. As obtaining in vivo Rubisco kinetics for different species is not achievable in the short-term, we propose to use in vitro kinetics as determined by the methods explained here and elsewhere (Kane et al, 1994; Ruuska et al, 1998; Parry et al, 2007; Shay and Kubien, 2013; Perdomo, 2015; Galmés et al, 2016; Orr et al, 2016; Prins et al, 2016) as a first proxy for in vivo kinetics.…”
The impact of the combined effects of heat stress, increased vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and water deficit on the physiology of major crops needs to be better understood to help identifying the expected negative consequences of climate change and heat waves on global agricultural productivity. To address this issue, rice, wheat, and maize plants were grown under control temperature (CT, 25°C, VPD 1.8 kPa), and a high temperature (HT, 38°C, VPD 3.5 kPa), both under well-watered (WW) and water deficit (WD) conditions. Gas-exchange measurements showed that, in general, WD conditions affected the leaf conductance to CO2, while growth at HT had a more marked effect on the biochemistry of photosynthesis. When combined, HT and WD had an additive effect in limiting photosynthesis. The negative impacts of the imposed treatments on the processes governing leaf gas-exchange were species-dependent. Wheat presented a higher sensitivity while rice and maize showed a higher acclimation potential to increased temperature. Rubisco and PEPC kinetic constants determined in vitro at 25°C and 38°C were used to estimate Vcmax, Jmax, and Vpmax in the modeling of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. The results here obtained reiterate the need to use species-specific and temperature-specific values for Rubisco and PEPC kinetic constants for a precise parameterization of the photosynthetic response to changing environmental conditions in different crop species.
“…This trend is not observed in Form I Rubisco from diatoms, which contain a carbon concentrating mechanism and sustain near‐C3 levels of enzyme specificity and carboxylation turnover rates, in addition to much slower rates of oxygenation (Young et al ). This highlights the need to eliminate sampling bias towards crop plants and model species and survey Rubisco kinetic data from diverse sources to identify alternative evolutionary pathways to lower oxygenase activity (Orr et al ; Prins et al ). Implementing a non‐native Rubisco, such as a high‐specificity red algal or cyanobacterial version, into crop plants could offer a greater benefit than enhancing native Rubisco kinetics alone, particularly when coupled with a carbon‐concentrating mechanism (Zhu et al ; Lin et al ).…”
Section: Current Approaches To Optimizing Photorespirationmentioning
In C3 plants, photorespiration is an energy-expensive process, including the oxygenation of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) by ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) and the ensuing multi-organellar photorespiratory pathway required to recycle the toxic byproducts and recapture a portion of the fixed carbon. Photorespiration significantly impacts crop productivity through reducing yields in C3 crops by as much as 50% under severe conditions. Thus, reducing the flux through, or improving the efficiency of photorespiration has the potential of large improvements in C3 crop productivity. Here, we review an array of approaches intended to engineer photorespiration in a range of plant systems with the goal of increasing crop productivity. Approaches include optimizing flux through the native photorespiratory pathway, installing non-native alternative photorespiratory pathways, and lowering or even eliminating Rubisco-catalyzed oxygenation of RuBP to reduce substrate entrance into the photorespiratory cycle. Some proposed designs have been successful at the proof of concept level. A plant systems-engineering approach, based on new opportunities available from synthetic biology to implement in silico designs, holds promise for further progress toward delivering more productive crops to farmer's fields.
“…Plant photosynthesis is limited by Rubisco (ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) activity much of the time due to its slow catalytic turnover, and concurrent oxygenase activity that competes with carbon fixation, especially in conditions of low chloroplastic CO 2 concentration and higher temperatures. That not all Rubiscos are identical has motivated work, reported at this meeting, on the extensive screening of natural diversity in Rubisco structure and kinetic properties (Galmés et al ., ; Whitney et al ., ; Hermida‐Carrera et al ., ; Orr et al ., ). Such characterization is essential to underpin attempts to tailor crops to future climates.…”
Section: Limitation Of Photosynthesis By Rubisco Kinetics and Photorementioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.