2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-012-0898-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on Mobility and Multihoming in Future Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a measure of the responsiveness, we can use either the worst case delay TRmax for declaring a tunnel down after a fault, or the average delay TRavg, as defined in eq. (1) and (2) (see Appendix II).…”
Section: Connectivity Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a measure of the responsiveness, we can use either the worst case delay TRmax for declaring a tunnel down after a fault, or the average delay TRavg, as defined in eq. (1) and (2) (see Appendix II).…”
Section: Connectivity Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact on these procedures on the processing load of Mobile Hosts and of Mobility Management Nodes and on the network load needs to be carefully assessed. From the analysis of the literature on mobility management (see the surveys [1], [2], [3]) we believe that these aspects have not been adequately covered so far. Most of the papers deal with architectural and protocol aspects of handover management, and/or focus on the performance of the handover procedure itself, but do not address the measurements procedures themselves which are needed to drive the interface selection and their computational and network load impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not included in this category by the survey in [15], NEMO (Network Mobility) is also considered in the related work for end-site mobility [18], as it manages the mobility of a network of nodes that are typically moving in tandem [19]. Separation between location and identity for the case of multihoming is also mentioned in [20], but using the ILNPv6 protocol.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a large-scale mobile environment, the number of MNs is huge and the handover is highly frequent. That means, only when the selection of SC is conducted in a distributed and self-organized manner, it can guarantee the efficiency [11,12]. While in the proactive case, the scalability is low because the handover has to be anticipated based on a specific algorithm and multiple brokers may be selected for duplicated caching.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%