2020
DOI: 10.3233/sw-190366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey on complex ontology matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the entities' semantic relationships in the lightweight ontologies could be more complicated and richer, lightweight sensor ontology alignment is more complex, that is, one source ontology entity is mapping with more than one target ontology entity, and the relationships could be equivalence or subsumption. To address this complex matching problem [51], a feasible method is to introduce various mapping patterns [52] into CcFA to detect the complex correspondences, which is one of our future work.…”
Section: The Results Of Statistical Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since the entities' semantic relationships in the lightweight ontologies could be more complicated and richer, lightweight sensor ontology alignment is more complex, that is, one source ontology entity is mapping with more than one target ontology entity, and the relationships could be equivalence or subsumption. To address this complex matching problem [51], a feasible method is to introduce various mapping patterns [52] into CcFA to detect the complex correspondences, which is one of our future work.…”
Section: The Results Of Statistical Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A semantic correspondence between ontology entities can be simple or complex [36]. In the former case, the correspondence expresses a relation between two simple entities, such as named classes, properties, or individuals; for instance, it may state that a named class in an ontology is equivalent to a named class in another ontology.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described by Thiéblin et al . (2018b), the metrics of accuracy and top-x accuracy have been also applied in evaluation settings in which the number of correspondences is predefined, for example, there is one correspondence for each entity of the target schema/ontology. The accuracy is then the percentage of predefined questions having a correct answer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The queries written for the source ontology were rewritten automatically when dealing with (1:1) or (1: n ) correspondences, using the system described by Thiéblin et al . (2016) and manually when dealing with ( m : n ) correspondences.…”
Section: Evaluation Without a Reference Alignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%