1972
DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-8.2.119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Wild Mammals in a Chesapeake Bay Area for Selected Zoonoses

Abstract: INTRODUCTION of concurrent research projects or study facilities of the Division of Veterinary Surveys for selected zoonoses were Medicine, Walter Reed Army Institute of conducted on small wild mammals, ex-Research (WRAIR). These included cluding rodents, located in an undevelop-leptospirosis, listeriosis, rickettsiosis, viral ed forest and swamp area of Aberdeen infections, toxoplasmosis, and filariasis. Proving Grounds, Maryland. Diseases Findings of this extensive study are selected for study were within th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall seroprevalence of the leptospiral infection in raccoons in this study was 46.1%, which is generally comparable to the other studies in North America such as 50% in Maryland (Alexander et al 1972), 58.8% in Georgia (Shotts et al 1975), 48% in Illinois (Mitchell et al 1999), 45% in Illinois (Hungerford et al 2000), 36% in Connecticut (Richardson & Gauthier 2003), 11% in Nebraska (Bischof & Rogers 2005), 19.1% in Washington (Davis et al 2007) and 47% in Indiana (Raizman et al 2009). However, the serological results may greatly underestimate infection with leptospiral serovars in the reservoir hosts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The overall seroprevalence of the leptospiral infection in raccoons in this study was 46.1%, which is generally comparable to the other studies in North America such as 50% in Maryland (Alexander et al 1972), 58.8% in Georgia (Shotts et al 1975), 48% in Illinois (Mitchell et al 1999), 45% in Illinois (Hungerford et al 2000), 36% in Connecticut (Richardson & Gauthier 2003), 11% in Nebraska (Bischof & Rogers 2005), 19.1% in Washington (Davis et al 2007) and 47% in Indiana (Raizman et al 2009). However, the serological results may greatly underestimate infection with leptospiral serovars in the reservoir hosts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Proteus is mainly used as diagnostic test for Rickettsia because a cross-reaction exists. Rickettsia has been reported in raccoons from the US and Japan (Alexander et al 1972, Baba et al 2013 and in humans from the northern and southeastern regions of Mexico (Zavala-Castro et al 2006). Rickettsial infections were associated with tick bites, but in the present study antibodies against Proteus were not detected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…WILNE~ (11) cited these results as possible criteria for placing the raeeoonpox virus (RPV) into the vaccinia/variola subgroup of poxviruses. The virus is apparently widespread in these animals since ALEXA~Dn~ et al (1) found hemagglutiilation inhibition (HI) antibody in sera of 22 out of 92 raccoons. They also found that, unlike the HA of other vaceinia-like viruses, I{PV HA was not inhibited by sera congaining antibody to monkeypox virus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%