2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1685861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Time Preference, Delay Discounting Models

Abstract: The paper surveys over twenty models of delay discounting (also known as temporal discounting, time preference, time discounting), that psychologists and economists have put forward to explain the way people actually trade off time and money. Using little more than the basic algebra of powers and logarithms, I show how the models are derived, what assumptions they are based upon, and how different models relate to each other. Rather than concentrate only on discount functions themselves, I show how discount fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
135
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
135
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of theories, models, and mechanisms have been proposed to explain why human decision makers discount future outcomes and, in particular, why we tend to be so impatient (e.g., Doyle 2013, Frederick et al 2002, Read 2004, Soman et al 2005, Urminsky and Zauberman 2014. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, none of these accounts have incorporated the mechanism examined in this paper: an Downloaded from informs.org by [137.205.202.97] on 25 April 2017, at 04:18 .…”
Section: Theoretical Links and Policy Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of theories, models, and mechanisms have been proposed to explain why human decision makers discount future outcomes and, in particular, why we tend to be so impatient (e.g., Doyle 2013, Frederick et al 2002, Read 2004, Soman et al 2005, Urminsky and Zauberman 2014. Yet, to the best of our knowledge, none of these accounts have incorporated the mechanism examined in this paper: an Downloaded from informs.org by [137.205.202.97] on 25 April 2017, at 04:18 .…”
Section: Theoretical Links and Policy Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luhmann, 2013), the 1-parameter hyperbolic model is simple and provides a good account of discounting in human (McKerchar et al, 2009) and non-human animals (Freeman et al, 2009). Second, a comparison of 4 prominent models shows clear superiority for the 1-parameter hyperbolic over a 1-parameter exponential model, but there is no clear rationale for placing attention on one of the more complex discount functions (McKerchar et al, 2009;Doyle, 2013).…”
Section: Choice Of the 1-parameter Discount Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R t is the discount factor for year t and r is the annual saving interest rate; the definition of R t represents the standard method of delay discounting by valuing a future cash flow in terms of its net present value (Doyle 2013). I is the initial investment cost of the ZT drill and GM t is the gross margin, i.e., the annual service provision revenue minus variable costs.…”
Section: Methodological Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%