2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfscie.2022.100018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of the mechanical and physical behaviors of yttria-stabilized zirconia from multiple dental laboratories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specimens were then tested and evaluated for their mechanical, physical, and optical properties. 10 The outcome was quite interesting and confirming that there is a large discrepancy in strength and translucency based on yttria content. Moreover, dental laboratories DID NOT always adhere to the details requested in a prescription for zirconia.…”
Section: Zirconia Ceramics and Yttria Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specimens were then tested and evaluated for their mechanical, physical, and optical properties. 10 The outcome was quite interesting and confirming that there is a large discrepancy in strength and translucency based on yttria content. Moreover, dental laboratories DID NOT always adhere to the details requested in a prescription for zirconia.…”
Section: Zirconia Ceramics and Yttria Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In a recent study, zirconia specimens were ordered from 9 dental laboratories for posterior (high strength) and anterior (high translucency) clinical indications. The specimens were then tested and evaluated for their mechanical, physical, and optical properties 10 . The outcome was quite interesting and confirming that there is a large discrepancy in strength and translucency based on yttria content.…”
Section: Zirconia Ceramics and Yttria Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, the fracture toughness of 5Y-TZP is almost 50% less compared to that of 3Y-TZP with the cubic phase content because of more yttria content ( Belli et al, 2021 ). In a recent study, ( Liao et al, 2023 ) showed that the flexural strength value was 584 (158) MPa for 3Y-TZP and 373 (104) MPa for 5Y-TZP.…”
Section: Survey Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5Y-TZP is more translucent by 20 to 25% but has less flexural strength by 40 to 50% compared to 3Y ( Ban, 2021 ). Hence, 3Y-TZP can be indicated for bridges, especially of long spans, and is not suitable for the anterior teeth ( Ban, 2021 ; Liao et al, 2023 ). Conversely, 5Y-TZP and M5Y are indicated for veneers and anterior crowns but are not suitable for long-span bridges ( Ban, 2021 ).…”
Section: Survey Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%