Text Mining 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470689646.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Text Visualization Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content analysis was conducted by way of key words counts, while the identification of themes was determined by expert analysis and operationalized by way of word cloud generation (Puretskiy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content analysis was conducted by way of key words counts, while the identification of themes was determined by expert analysis and operationalized by way of word cloud generation (Puretskiy et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, disadvantages pertaining to text mining are perceivable. For instance, the further interpretation of Text Mining results is necessary, but the reduction of a huge quantity of data is often still much too large for a human analyst [19]. With regard to web pages, they "could be in any language, which complicates an already challenging text mining problem" [19] [20].…”
Section: B Applications Of Text Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This often requires a great deal of time and effort on the part of human analysts. Visual postprocessing tools tailored for specific TM packages can therefore greatly facilitate the analysis process (Puretskiy, Shutt and Berry, 2010).…”
Section: Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%