2019
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of subjective "God encounter experiences": Comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT

Abstract: Naturally occurring and psychedelic drug–occasioned experiences interpreted as personal encounters with God are well described but have not been systematically compared. In this study, five groups of individuals participated in an online survey with detailed questions characterizing the subjective phenomena, interpretation, and persisting changes attributed to their single most memorable God encounter experience (n = 809 Non-Drug, 1184 psilocybin, 1251 lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 435 ayahuasca, and 606 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
162
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
17
162
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, because some questions may have been distressing to some individuals, participants were given the option to select "prefer not to answer" to skip any individual item in a survey. b Score range for each measure: PTSD symptoms (0-80; scores above 31-33 suggest need for PTSD treatment; decrease of 10 or more considered clinically meaningful) 48 ; depression symptoms (0-6; score above 3 suggests major depressive disorder likely) 49 ; anxiety symptoms (0-6; score above 3 suggests generalized anxiety disorder likely) 50,51 ; cognitive impairment (0-5) 54 ; suicidal ideation (0-12) 52,53 ; psychological flexibility (1-7). 57 c Effect sizes are approximately 2 to 4 times greater than what would be considered a "large" effect (i.e., >.80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, because some questions may have been distressing to some individuals, participants were given the option to select "prefer not to answer" to skip any individual item in a survey. b Score range for each measure: PTSD symptoms (0-80; scores above 31-33 suggest need for PTSD treatment; decrease of 10 or more considered clinically meaningful) 48 ; depression symptoms (0-6; score above 3 suggests major depressive disorder likely) 49 ; anxiety symptoms (0-6; score above 3 suggests generalized anxiety disorder likely) 50,51 ; cognitive impairment (0-5) 54 ; suicidal ideation (0-12) 52,53 ; psychological flexibility (1-7). 57 c Effect sizes are approximately 2 to 4 times greater than what would be considered a "large" effect (i.e., >.80).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 50 In a recent prospective study, a single administration of vaporized 5-MeO-DMT from toad secretion was associated with reductions in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress as well as increased life satisfaction and mindfulness-related capacities. 51 The observed psychotherapeutic effects of 5-MeO-DMT may occur in part through occasioning mystical-type experiences 52 or experiences of ego dissolution 51 similar to other classical psychedelics such as psilocybin 53 , 54 and LSD. 55 5-MeO-DMT also demonstrates neuroprotective, regenerative, and anti-inflammatory properties which may prove therapeutic in addressing the underlying etiology of cognitive impairment and PTSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…however, it is likely that due to the specific aim of the study the respondents had intentions of achieving this kind of experience [69]. Given that psychedelics have previously been shown to enhance suggestibility [70], and strong assumptions and increasing evidence for the role of expectation [26] one must be mindful of the influence of priming on the reported content of psychedelic experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there was a call to consider individual differences, such as age-related concerns in psychedelic treatment (Aday et al., 2020), and the first experiment to evaluate microdosing in a strictly older adult population was published online in late 2019 (Family et al., 2020). Finally, 2019 was an important year for psychedelic research because a number of impactful findings were published on the drugs’ effects on depression (Davis et al., 2019), substance misuse (Garcia-Romeu et al., 2019), mindfulness (Smigielski et al., 2019), life satisfaction (Uthaug et al., 2019), nature relatedness (Kettner et al., 2019), spiritual experiences (Griffiths et al., 2019), and neural processing (Pallavicini et al., 2019).…”
Section: Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%