2010
DOI: 10.5296/npa.v2i1.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of Search and Replication Schemes in Unstructured P2p Networks

Abstract: P2P computing lifts taxing issues in various areas of computer science. The largely used decentralized unstructured P2P systems are ad hoc in nature and present a number of research challenges. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive theoretical survey of various state-of-the-art search and replication schemes in unstructured P2P networks for file-sharing applications. The classifications of search and replication techniques and their advantages and disadvantages are briefly explained. Finally, the various i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all the prior work on replication, the problem of replica distribution is often addressed. If we take the heterogeneity factors in item size and request rate into account and allocate a proper number of replicas (i.e., the storage space) for each item, the system performance, such as success rate and expected search size, is expected to be improved when the system storage capability is fixed [2][3][4]. The related work shows that the replica distribution has different effects on the system performance from many aspects and consequently the optimal replica distributions are different when we set different objectives to optimize.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among all the prior work on replication, the problem of replica distribution is often addressed. If we take the heterogeneity factors in item size and request rate into account and allocate a proper number of replicas (i.e., the storage space) for each item, the system performance, such as success rate and expected search size, is expected to be improved when the system storage capability is fixed [2][3][4]. The related work shows that the replica distribution has different effects on the system performance from many aspects and consequently the optimal replica distributions are different when we set different objectives to optimize.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, most applications of peer-to-peer systems focus on unstructured peer-to-peer networks and designing an efficient search method is the most important issue [2]. Search methods in unstructured peer-to-peer networks can be divided to two groups: Blind and Informed [3][4]. In blind search strategies, nodes keep no information about placement of the objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since searching in unstructured P2P networks is blind, replicas of files distributed over networks contribute to quick and reliable file searching. In [11], several previous replication methods are reviewed from two aspects, which are selection of files for replication and selection of sites for hosting new replicas, and a new replication method is also proposed. The replication method proposed in [11], Qreplication, selects files for replication based on calculation of popularity of the files in each peer.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [11], several previous replication methods are reviewed from two aspects, which are selection of files for replication and selection of sites for hosting new replicas, and a new replication method is also proposed. The replication method proposed in [11], Qreplication, selects files for replication based on calculation of popularity of the files in each peer. Also, it selects peers for hosting new replicas from among peers reachable from a peer of focus by random-walk with limited hop counts, in which the ability and availability of the candidate peers for hosting new replicas are considered to be selected.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation