2020
DOI: 10.1186/s42523-020-00042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of rumen microbiota of domestic grazing yak during different growth stages revealed novel maturation patterns of four key microbial groups and their dynamic interactions

Abstract: Background: The development and maturation of rumen microbiota across the lifetime of grazing yaks remain unexplored due to the varied lifestyles and feed types of yaks as well as the challenges of obtaining samples. In addition, the interactions among four different rumen microbial groups (bacteria, archaea, fungi and protozoa) in the rumen of yak are not well defined. In this study, the rumen microbiota of full-grazing yaks aged 7 days to 12 years old was assessed to determine the maturation patterns of thes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(125 reference statements)
4
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, convergent evolution was reported for yaks and their rumen microbiota. The rumen microbiota follow unique maturation strategies 19 and differ in composition from microbiota of lowland ruminants 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, convergent evolution was reported for yaks and their rumen microbiota. The rumen microbiota follow unique maturation strategies 19 and differ in composition from microbiota of lowland ruminants 4 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional and commonly used approach to identify microbial interactions is the construction of microbial co-occurrence networks using a correlation-based method (Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation coefficient) [2] , [3] , [5] , [6] . This method is prone to detecting spurious correlations among low abundance taxa [7] and can lead to an ill-defined understanding of microbial interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While, Firmicutes, Fibrobacteres, Bacteroidetes, Euryarchaeota, and Proteobacteria were the predominant phyla in the cattle-yak rumen microbial community [10]. The rumen microbial groups varied through the growth of yaks from neonatal to adult and compared with the protozoan and fungal groups, the bacterial and archaeal groups were more sensitive to changes in growth stages [32]. A total of 7200 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were gained from the yak rumen using 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and 23 phyla within 159 families were identi ed by taxonomic summarization [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%