2000
DOI: 10.1079/wps20000003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey of laying hen husbandry in Switzerland

Abstract: In Switzerland eggs have not been produced in battery cages since January 1992. During the 10 year period from 1981 farmers replaced their battery cages with deep litter, aviary and grid-floor systems and modified cages. However, the cages used to replace the conventional battery cages and most of the gridfloor systems did not fulfil the requirements of the Swiss Welfare Act and they were not permitted to be advertised or sold thereafter. Sixteen years after the ban on battery cages, the Federal Veterinary Off… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Riber and Hinrichsen (accepted 2) found a tendency for 62 weeks old hens in multi-tiered barn and organic systems to have a poorer plumage than hens in single-tiered systems. In contrast, Häne et al (2000) found no difference in the plumage condition between multi-tiered and single-tiered systems (with permanent access to littered area) for hens between 50 to 70 weeks of age. The discrepancy is likely to Hinrichsen, Riber and Labouriau be due to differences in the conditions laying hens are kept under in the countries involved in the two studies (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Riber and Hinrichsen (accepted 2) found a tendency for 62 weeks old hens in multi-tiered barn and organic systems to have a poorer plumage than hens in single-tiered systems. In contrast, Häne et al (2000) found no difference in the plumage condition between multi-tiered and single-tiered systems (with permanent access to littered area) for hens between 50 to 70 weeks of age. The discrepancy is likely to Hinrichsen, Riber and Labouriau be due to differences in the conditions laying hens are kept under in the countries involved in the two studies (i.e.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…Since housing of laying hens in cages is forbidden in Switzerland since 1992, there is long lasting experience with alternative housing types (Häne et al., 2000; Kaufmann‐Bart and Hoop, 2009). The four predominant housing types in Switzerland are farms, where the hens either have access to a pasture area (‘organic’ and conventional ‘free‐range’), to an isolated and sheltered ‘outdoor scratching area’ or without any outdoor access (indoor).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore some conclusions were and still are drawn from routine investigations at autopsy at clinical veterinary departments and institutes where birds have been sent in from commercial production. There are several recent reports in which non cage housing systems have been widely introduced lately and where the incidence of bacterial/protozoa infections like erysipelas, E.coli, pasteurellosis and histomoniasis and Ascaridia show a marked increased prevalence in floor-kept birds per se compared with cages (Häne et al, 2000;Hafez, 2001;Hafez et al 2001;Permin, et al, 2002;Esquenet et al, 2003;SVA, 2004).…”
Section: Infectious Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%