1995
DOI: 10.1016/0950-7051(96)81920-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
588
0
8

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 975 publications
(611 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
588
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…ANN have proven their efficiency in dependency extraction (see Section 2.1.2) which we will use in our study [5,29].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANN have proven their efficiency in dependency extraction (see Section 2.1.2) which we will use in our study [5,29].…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rule extraction algorithm can be roughly divided into two main categories: decompositional and pedagogical (Andrews et al, 1995). Decompositional algorithms take the underlying classification algorithm into account.…”
Section: Rule Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BSVM improves largely the interpretability of standard SVMs by the use of queries of type (1). In this section we illustrate how our method takes us one step further towards interpretability via the use of the visualization tool To do this, we have considered two databases with different characteristics, namely bupa and sonar, which have respectively 6 and 60 predictor variables.…”
Section: Interpretabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the obtained classification rule is based on queries of type (1), the critical values and intervals of the predictor variables are identified, as done by Classification Trees.…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation