2013 3rd IEEE International Advance Computing Conference (IACC) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/iadcc.2013.6514261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Survey and analysis of mobility management protocols for handover in wireless network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, most of the deployed architectures, such as 3GPP (Third Generation Partnership Project) networks, have a small number of centralized anchors managing the traffic of thousands of mobile users, but these centralized approaches have certain problems [8]. The evolution towards DMM approaches has shown improvements in better use of network resources [11,12,13,14,15]. Additionally, future mobile networks will be driven by software, relying on emerging technologies such as SDN [16,17,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, most of the deployed architectures, such as 3GPP (Third Generation Partnership Project) networks, have a small number of centralized anchors managing the traffic of thousands of mobile users, but these centralized approaches have certain problems [8]. The evolution towards DMM approaches has shown improvements in better use of network resources [11,12,13,14,15]. Additionally, future mobile networks will be driven by software, relying on emerging technologies such as SDN [16,17,18].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the FMIPv6 framework, the next access point is predetermined by the bottom layer to reduce the handover delay. However, some interactive signaling messages between the access router and the new access router are introduced [15]. The HMIPv6 protocol introduces a proxy hierarchy mechanism, which adds a Mobile Anchor Point (MAP) to the network to handle local handover.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mobility support can be classified in host based or network based [33,34]. These two approaches mainly differ in the responsibility of the MN tracking.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also distinct ways to support flow mobility [33]; there are solutions that in part permit the mobility of users flows either supported by the host [7], [8], [13] or by the network [9], [10], [16]. There is also one network based solution [11], [12] that proposes the concept of packet mobility and the introduction of network coding.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%