Surveillance of Health Care Workers Exposed to Blood from Patients Infected with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus

Abstract

Since 1983, we have conducted national surveillance of health care workers exposed to blood or body fluids from persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), to assess the risk of HIV transmission by such exposures. As of July 31, 1988, 1201 health care workers with blood exposures had been examined, including 751 nurses (63 percent), 164 physicians and medical students (14 percent), 134 laboratory workers (11 percent), and 90 phlebotomists (7 percent). The exposures resulted from needle-stick injuries (80 percent), cuts with sharp objects (8 percent), open-wound contamination (7 percent), and mucous-membrane exposure (5 percent). We concluded that 37 percent of the exposures might have been prevented. Of 963 health care workers whose serum has been tested for HIV antibody at least 180 days after exposure, 4 were positive, yielding a seroprevalence rate of 0.42 percent (upper limit of 95 percent confidence interval, 0.95 percent). Three subjects experienced an acute retroviral syndrome associated with documented seroconversion; serum collected within 30 days of exposure was not available from the fourth person. Two exposures that resulted in seroconversion were caused by coworkers during resuscitation procedures. We conclude that the risk of HIV infection after exposure to the blood of a patient infected with HIV is low, but at least six months of follow-up is recommended. Many exposures can be prevented by careful adherence to existing infection-control precautions, even during emergencies.

Nurses’ knowledge and beliefs about AIDS: comparing nurses in hospital, community and hospice settings

“…INTRODUCTION ^^ preventative vaccme and no cure (Bamck 1988, Marcus 1988 In fact, recent vaccme trials appear to have suffered…”

Computer‐assisted instruction in aids infection control for physicians

“…appropriate measures could reduce workplace transmission by as much as 37%. 3 Thus, it is critical that medical personnel be aware of these infection control steps and apply them in practice. The large number of health-care workers and the updating of recommendations as new information becomes available places a major educational demand on the medical-care system.…”

The epidemiology and transmission of AIDS: A hypothesis linking behavioural and biological determinants to time, person and place

“…It is surprising that, in the many surveys of HIV infection and AIDS in haemophilia, and in an official, collaborative, prospective study in Britain, there is little or no reference to this vital aspect of transmission and control of infection. However, the virtual absence of ARCs and AIDS in other surveys (Marcus, 1988) of tens of thousands of health professionals exposed to needle-stick injuries, lesions and body fluids in the routine care for patients with AIDS and HIV seropositives show that, with one questionable excep= tion (Lancet, 1992) the pathogenicity of HIV, even when transmitted, is minimal or absent in persons who are immuno-competent, in contrast with that of hepatitis B which is so readily transmitted that immunisation is now a routine for clinical personnel.…”