Surveillance of athlete mental health symptoms and disorders: a supplement to the International Olympic Committee’s consensus statement on injury and illness surveillance
Abstract:In 2019, the International Olympic Committee (IOC) published a consensus statement outlining the principles for recording and reporting injury and illness in elite sport. The authors encouraged sport federations to adapt the framework to their sport-specific context. Since this publication, several sports have published extensions to the IOC consensus statement.In response to a paucity of epidemiological data on athlete mental health, the IOC mental health working group adapted the IOC consensus statement on i… Show more
“…In aggregate, it appears that rates of depression among the young adult general population are higher than among collegiate athletes 3 4 24. Although those who compete in collegiate sports may have lower rates of depression compared with the general population, the absolute rate of mental health issues in this population remain concerning with the NCAA and International Olympic Committee recommending regular mental health screening in athletes 5–8…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, suicide rates across all ages increased by approximately 36% between 2001 and 2021 2. Data from 2001 to 2020 demonstrate suicide rates, specifically among young adults,3–9 have also increased, rising to their highest level in 2020 10. Death by suicide is now the third leading cause of death in the USA in the general population ages 18–24 after accidents and homicide 10.…”
ObjectivesTo determine the incidence rate of suicide from 2002 to 2022 among athletes from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and assess for potential differences by, sex, race, division and sport.MethodsNCAA athlete deaths over a 20-year period from 2002 to 2022 were identified. Poisson regression models were built to assess changes in incidence rates over time. Linear and quadratic fits between year and suicide incidence for males and females were evaluated.ResultsOf 1102 total deaths, 128 (11.6%) deaths by suicide were reported (male n=98, female n=30). The overall incidence was 1:71 145 athlete-years (AYs). Over the last decade, suicide was the second most common cause of death after accidents. The proportion of deaths by suicide doubled from the first 10 years (7.6%) to the second 10 years (15.3%). The suicide incidence rate for males increased linearly (5-year incidence rate ratio 1.32 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.53)), whereas a quadratic association was identified among female athletes (p=0.002), with the incidence rate reaching its lowest point in females in 2010–2011 and increasing thereafter. Male cross-country athletes had the highest suicide incidence rate (1:29 815 AYs) and Division I and II athletes had a higher suicide incidence rate than Division III athletes. No significant differences in suicide incidence rates by sex, race or sport were identified.ConclusionDeaths by suicide among NCAA athletes increased in both males and females throughout the 20-year study period, and suicide is now the second most common cause of death in this population. Greater suicide prevention efforts geared towards NCAA athletes are warranted.
“…In aggregate, it appears that rates of depression among the young adult general population are higher than among collegiate athletes 3 4 24. Although those who compete in collegiate sports may have lower rates of depression compared with the general population, the absolute rate of mental health issues in this population remain concerning with the NCAA and International Olympic Committee recommending regular mental health screening in athletes 5–8…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the USA, suicide rates across all ages increased by approximately 36% between 2001 and 2021 2. Data from 2001 to 2020 demonstrate suicide rates, specifically among young adults,3–9 have also increased, rising to their highest level in 2020 10. Death by suicide is now the third leading cause of death in the USA in the general population ages 18–24 after accidents and homicide 10.…”
ObjectivesTo determine the incidence rate of suicide from 2002 to 2022 among athletes from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and assess for potential differences by, sex, race, division and sport.MethodsNCAA athlete deaths over a 20-year period from 2002 to 2022 were identified. Poisson regression models were built to assess changes in incidence rates over time. Linear and quadratic fits between year and suicide incidence for males and females were evaluated.ResultsOf 1102 total deaths, 128 (11.6%) deaths by suicide were reported (male n=98, female n=30). The overall incidence was 1:71 145 athlete-years (AYs). Over the last decade, suicide was the second most common cause of death after accidents. The proportion of deaths by suicide doubled from the first 10 years (7.6%) to the second 10 years (15.3%). The suicide incidence rate for males increased linearly (5-year incidence rate ratio 1.32 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.53)), whereas a quadratic association was identified among female athletes (p=0.002), with the incidence rate reaching its lowest point in females in 2010–2011 and increasing thereafter. Male cross-country athletes had the highest suicide incidence rate (1:29 815 AYs) and Division I and II athletes had a higher suicide incidence rate than Division III athletes. No significant differences in suicide incidence rates by sex, race or sport were identified.ConclusionDeaths by suicide among NCAA athletes increased in both males and females throughout the 20-year study period, and suicide is now the second most common cause of death in this population. Greater suicide prevention efforts geared towards NCAA athletes are warranted.
“…Although future surveillance work will incorporate the most contemporary diagnostic codes, the current study is limited in terms of classifying infectious illnesses as their own body system (‘infections’), whereby more recent versions of the Orchard Sports Injury and Illness Classification System (OSIICS) system would include infection as an aetiology within other body system categories. Lastly, out of concerns regarding athlete privacy and the abstention from delivering formal psychological diagnoses, along with the absence of standardised methods for monitoring mental health conditions among athletes during the data collection phase (the mental health supplement to the IOC surveillance consensus statement was published in July 202347), the sports medicine and psychological services team made the decision not to classify mental health interactions, consequently omitting them from the overarching surveillance programme. As such, a broad aspect of holistic athlete health and well-being remains unaddressed in the current framework, and thus it is imperative that future athlete health surveillance systems take this into account, as has been recently recommended 47…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, out of concerns regarding athlete privacy and the abstention from delivering formal psychological diagnoses, along with the absence of standardised methods for monitoring mental health conditions among athletes during the data collection phase (the mental health supplement to the IOC surveillance consensus statement was published in July 202347), the sports medicine and psychological services team made the decision not to classify mental health interactions, consequently omitting them from the overarching surveillance programme. As such, a broad aspect of holistic athlete health and well-being remains unaddressed in the current framework, and thus it is imperative that future athlete health surveillance systems take this into account, as has been recently recommended 47…”
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the injury and illness incidence from Team USA athletes from the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games and assess any sex-based differences or differences between Olympic and Paralympic athletes.MethodsTeam USA Olympic (n=231, 48.5% female) and Team USA Paralympic (n=63, 22.2% female) athletes had medical encounters documented during the Games. Injuries and illnesses were defined according to the 2020 International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement and reviewed for accuracy by a physician. Incidence rates were calculated per 1000 athlete-days and further analysed by sex, sport, anatomical location, type of illness, injury event and injury mechanism, with incident rate ratios (IRRs) used for group comparisons.ResultsThere were no differences in illness (Olympic illness, IRR=0.99 (95% CI 0.48 to 2.07), p=0.998; Paralympic illness, IRR=1.43 (95% CI 0.41 to 4.97), p=0.572) or injury rates (Olympic injury, IRR=0.63 (95% CI 0.39 to 1.03), p=0.062; Paralympic injury, IRR=1.01 (95% CI 0.43 to 2.35), p=0.988) between male and female (reference group) athletes. However, Olympic athletes had significantly lower illness (IRR=0.41 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.76), p=0.003) and injury (IRR=0.56 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.87), p=0.009) risks compared with Paralympic athletes.ConclusionNo significant sex-related differences in injury or illness were detected in Team USA Olympic or Paralympic participating in the 2022 Beijing Winter Games. However, Paralympic athletes exhibited higher rates of injury and illness compared with their Olympic counterparts. This study highlights delegation-specific epidemiological data which may facilitate more focused approaches for injury and illness prevention.
“…Then, in order to prevent any misuse of the information for purposes such as athlete selection or contract negotiations, it is important to strictly and reliably implement informed consent for athletes and the de-identification of personal information. Mountjoy et al [44] have recently developed surveillance formats that may be useful in reviewing diagnosis, treatment and outcomes and in developing practice guidelines for athletes. With regards the mental health of elite athletes, Reardon et al [45] identified 13 key steps for future directions.…”
Section: The Role Of Psychiatrists In Researchmentioning
Introduction: This article outlines the important and varied role of sports psychiatrists in Japan and highlights the unique challenges and contributions of sports psychiatry to improving the mental health and performance of athletes. The report emphasizes the need for accurate assessment, diagnosis and treatment of mental health problems in athletes and recognizes the cultural stigmas and pressures specific to competitive sport in Japan. Methods: The paper first reviews the development of sports psychiatry with reference to the founding principles of the International Society for Sports Psychiatry and the Japan Association of Sports Psychiatry. It examines the integration of sport into psychiatric care and vice versa and indicates the value of research in the relationship between exercise and mental well-being. Results: This paper also explores the development of comprehensive diagnostic guidelines, the creation of tailored therapeutic approaches in clinical practice, the promotion of collaborative research to advance the field, and the educational development of psychological specialists. The role of sport psychiatrists in education and public awareness is examined, as well as the importance of destigmatizing mental illness in sport and improving mental health literacy among athletes and their support networks. Conclusion: Overall, this article describes the evolving and multifaceted role of sports psychiatrists in Japan, highlighting their crucial contributions to athlete care, research, education and public awareness. It advocates a flexible and adaptable approach to meeting the ever-changing demands of sports and upholding the mental health needs of athletes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.