2008
DOI: 10.1080/14616690801890109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance in Germany After 9/11

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of liberalization of immigration laws, a process of securitization began in Germany, the main targets of which were Muslim communities, who were increasingly perceived as a ‘threat’ for security and social cohesion (Faist, 2004: 2). New anti-terror laws were introduced to control migrant organizations and media, especially those of Muslims (Kruse et al, 2003: 132; Topal, 2008: 811). Out of the 24 articles of the Law on Fighting Terrorism in 2002, six were devoted to foreigners, which shows that the lawmakers perceived a direct linkage between migration and terrorism (Diez and Squire, 2008: 575).…”
Section: The 2000s: Between Securitization and More Comprehensive Integration Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of liberalization of immigration laws, a process of securitization began in Germany, the main targets of which were Muslim communities, who were increasingly perceived as a ‘threat’ for security and social cohesion (Faist, 2004: 2). New anti-terror laws were introduced to control migrant organizations and media, especially those of Muslims (Kruse et al, 2003: 132; Topal, 2008: 811). Out of the 24 articles of the Law on Fighting Terrorism in 2002, six were devoted to foreigners, which shows that the lawmakers perceived a direct linkage between migration and terrorism (Diez and Squire, 2008: 575).…”
Section: The 2000s: Between Securitization and More Comprehensive Integration Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%