1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41359-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance for Stage I Non-Seminomatous Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis: The Optimal Protocol has not yet been Defined

Abstract: Forty-six patients with clinical stage I testicular non-seminomatous germ cell tumours were followed up according to a protocol of active surveillance between 1979 and 1987. The median follow-up time was 40 + months. Thirteen patients (28%) relapsed, predominantly in retroperitoneum and/or lung. Ten of these relapses (76%) occurred within 8 months of orchiectomy. Relapses occurred in 7/35 T1 tumours and 5/10 T2 to T4 tumours. No correlation was detected between the histological type and relapse rate. Three lat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relapse rate for patients managed with surveillance ranges between 25% and 35% [13,14]; as the retroperitoneum is the most c o m m o n metastatic site, a lower rate of relapse in any surgical series (13% in the present series) is obviously a function of early clearance of the retroperitoneum as a potential relapse site by R P L N D itself. Although not statistically significant, the mortality related to cancer (or to treatment) is also lower in the surgical group (n = 3, 0.8%) than in surveillance series (range, 0.9%-4.4%) [14,15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relapse rate for patients managed with surveillance ranges between 25% and 35% [13,14]; as the retroperitoneum is the most c o m m o n metastatic site, a lower rate of relapse in any surgical series (13% in the present series) is obviously a function of early clearance of the retroperitoneum as a potential relapse site by R P L N D itself. Although not statistically significant, the mortality related to cancer (or to treatment) is also lower in the surgical group (n = 3, 0.8%) than in surveillance series (range, 0.9%-4.4%) [14,15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other feature of RPLND was that it appeared to confer a clear advantage on patients who did subsequently relapse. Such patients proved to be uniformly curable, in marked contrast to those relapsing in series using abdominal radiation [14,15]. The reason for this was twofold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor markers were elevated in 1 of 2 recurrent seminoma patients and in 9 of 10 in recurrent NSGCT patients at the time of recurrence. Although tumor markers were usehl for close follow-up especially in NSGCT patients, there was 1 patient who recurred in Peckham et al 1982"' Johnson et al 198W Pizzocaro et al 1985:' Hoshin et al 1986" Raghavan et al 1988" Dunphy et al 1988" Wishnow et al 1989" Freiha 8. Torti 1989"' Sturgeon et al 1992 the lung without any elevation of tumor markers (Table 4, no.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, 3.5% of stage I NSGCT patients (91256) died of recurrent cancer. 16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Seminoma is likely to have a low propensity for d i~s e m i n a t i o n .~l >~~ Surveillance for stage I seminoma could be the best treatment option because retroperitoneal lymph node involvement appears to be the common pattern ofrecurrence which can be detected by CT scan before it is large in volume, and good responses can be obtained using cisplatin-based Chemotherapy. Since seminoma is a highly radiosensitive tumor, low recurrence rates (less than 5%) are observed after radical orchiectomy and infradiaphragmatic lymph node irradiation in stage I patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, several studies have shown that initial active surveillance after orchidectomy, with delayed treatment for relapse, is a safe option for patients with CS I NSGCT [9,19,22,24,27,32,38,42–46] (Table 1). Potential prognostic factors for relapse have been identified and risk‐adapted treatment policies are used by many groups [9,35,41,47,48].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%