1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9926(199707/08)56:1/2<37::aid-tera8>3.3.co;2-n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surveillance for Anencephaly and Spina Bifida and the Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis—United States, 1985–1994

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, within-country differences have been observed between racial and ethnic groups. For example, in the USA, Hispanics have higher spina bifida prevalence 8, and African-Americans have lower prevalence 9, compared with non-Hispanic whites. Prevalence differences in time and across geographic regions have been attributed to variations in ascertainment methods as well as to true differences in risk.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, within-country differences have been observed between racial and ethnic groups. For example, in the USA, Hispanics have higher spina bifida prevalence 8, and African-Americans have lower prevalence 9, compared with non-Hispanic whites. Prevalence differences in time and across geographic regions have been attributed to variations in ascertainment methods as well as to true differences in risk.…”
Section: Epidemiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neural-tube defects (NTD) are among the most common birth defects reported worldwide, with a declining US-incidence of 2-3/1000 in 1970, to 1/1000 in 1990 Cragan et al, 1995). Despite considerable dedicated effort and the discovery in mice of several genes causing NTD, no gene(s) causing NTD have been found in humans (Rozen, 1996;Motulsky, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have found substantial differences in the estimated prevalence of many types of birth defects depending on whether cases among terminated pregnancies are included or not and depending on the source used to ascertain these cases (e.g., hospitals vs. prenatal clinics) (13, 17, 18). Even with multiple sources of ascertainment, birth defects surveillance programs typically cannot achieve complete case ascertainment among terminated pregnancies, and the proportion of cases missed remains unknown but is likely substantial for some defects such as spina bifida.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several potential mechanisms have been posited (14), including bias due to incomplete ascertainment of cases among terminated pregnancies (513). Because ascertainment of terminated pregnancies is more difficult than ascertainment of live births and stillbirths, selection bias can occur when prenatal diagnosis of a birth defect increases the probability of termination, and termination differs by exposure status (6, 9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation