2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhg.2009.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogation and the politics of remembering slavery in Savannah, Georgia (USA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been found that there is some level of discomfort among whites if photographs of parks show a majority of black visitors (Stanfield et al 2005). Even former plantations worked by slaves have been whitewashed, with slave quarters and living conditions either not mentioned or presented in a positive light (Eichstedt & Small 2002 Butler et al 2008;Alderman 2010). Given that the overwhelming majority of park units are visited nearly entirely by whites, it can be expected that park interpretation and visitor facilities will not only reflect this demographic groups' needs, expectations, and desires, but do so in ways that renders this 'whiteness' invisible to this group.…”
Section: National Parks and African Americansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that there is some level of discomfort among whites if photographs of parks show a majority of black visitors (Stanfield et al 2005). Even former plantations worked by slaves have been whitewashed, with slave quarters and living conditions either not mentioned or presented in a positive light (Eichstedt & Small 2002 Butler et al 2008;Alderman 2010). Given that the overwhelming majority of park units are visited nearly entirely by whites, it can be expected that park interpretation and visitor facilities will not only reflect this demographic groups' needs, expectations, and desires, but do so in ways that renders this 'whiteness' invisible to this group.…”
Section: National Parks and African Americansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legg (2005, p. 195), too, has identified how the Gurdwara site in Delhi 'functioned as a site of counter-memory not just in terms of discourse and the archive, but in terms of a local and distinctly spatial construction of memory against forgetting'. Alderman's analysis of efforts to establish sites of counter-memory to the enslaved in Savannah, Georgia in the US highlights how finding appropriate wording to encapsulate the trauma of slavery for African Americans lay at the heart of the struggle to remember (or forget) this painful episode (Alderman, 2010). Words, too, lay at the epicentre of disputes over Omagh's endeavours to publicly mark the trauma of the bombing, and, while the use of particular words provided healing for some, they became a source of dissent for others (Johnson, 2012).…”
Section: Space Memory and Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have assessed the commemorative landscape and the representation of heritage that is projected to observers at monuments and other historic sites. Significant work that unpacks heritage texts in the collective memory includes how Americans commemorate (or choose to forget) sites of violence and tragedy (Foote ), memorialization of the civil rights movement in the American South (Dwyer and Alderman ), how the controversial past is remembered and forgotten in Berlin, Germany (Till ), the commemorative landscape at a Savannah, Georgia, monument remembering slavery (Alderman ), thematic representations of American Indians along the Great Plains section of the Lewis and Clark Trail (Blake ), and an analysis of the uneven process of accurately commemorating an Oklahoma land run (DeLyser ). Key to this research is an analysis of what narratives are remembered, what is ignored or forgotten, which social actors and ideologies shape the commemorative landscape, and where sites of public memory are located.…”
Section: Route 66 Heritage Tourism and Commemorative Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%