2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate Markers and Reporting Standards for Outcome After Carotid Intervention

Abstract: Recently, a focus on the timing of intervention, as well as improvements in medical therapy, have changed the clinical treatment algorithm of carotid revascularisation. The debate remains alive when it comes to the optimal treatment strategy, including early (<14 days) vs. expedited (<48 h) revascularisation, the role of plaque vulnerability in decision making, and alternative (endovascular) revascularisation approaches. In weighing up the relative contribution and relevance of these strategies on outcome, it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future research should focus on how pre-operative baseline imaging can be used to determine the optimal treatment strategy. 29 Such studies should also focus on the relationship between WML and other promising imaging markers such as (silent) ischaemic brain lesions, which have been associated with poor outcome and WMLs. 30,31 Studies should report predictive value of both ipsi-and contralateral cerebral lesions, should investigate methods for easy identification and quantification of lesions, and should stratify symptomatic from asymptomatic patients in their analysis.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future research should focus on how pre-operative baseline imaging can be used to determine the optimal treatment strategy. 29 Such studies should also focus on the relationship between WML and other promising imaging markers such as (silent) ischaemic brain lesions, which have been associated with poor outcome and WMLs. 30,31 Studies should report predictive value of both ipsi-and contralateral cerebral lesions, should investigate methods for easy identification and quantification of lesions, and should stratify symptomatic from asymptomatic patients in their analysis.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In CAS patients, higher age, plaque vulnerability, and complex carotid/aortic arch anatomy have been identified as risk factors. 3,12 In mostly symptomatic patients, new ischemic brain lesions were identified on repeat examination at 24 to 48 hours after 4 (12.9%) TCAR versus 11 TFCAS procedures (33.3%; P=0.03). Unfortunately, the timing of the intervention (relative to the index event) was not reported.…”
Section: See Related Article P 100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other post-hoc analysis illustrated that plaque composition varied by clinical presentation and type of index event, showing that patients with ocular ischemic events had comparable plaque characteristics to asymptomatic patients, and had relatively less vulnerable plaque characteristics compared to patients with recent stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) (18). In addition to clinical symptoms, high risk plaques were also associated with the presence of silent ischemic brain lesions on imaging which are increasingly proposed as surrogate marker for stroke (19). A recent retrospective AE study investigated the presence of silent brain lesions on magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (MR-DWI) during the waiting period between index event and CEA.…”
Section: Translation Of Ex Vivo Plaque Characterization Into In Vivo Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DWI lesions represent acute ischemic brain areas that can be detected on brain imaging within minutes after a hypoxic event and remain visible for several days (19). The MRI substudy within International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) demonstrated that patients in the CAS group with DWI positive scans had a significantly higher risk on any recurrent stroke or TIA than patients with DWI negative scans (68).…”
Section: Diffusion Weighted Imaging (Dwi)mentioning
confidence: 99%