2009
DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2009473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Surrogate Consent for Genomics Research in Intensive Care

Abstract: Surrogate decision makers may be poorly prepared to give informed consent for genomics research for their loved ones in intensive care. A review of the challenges and strategies associated with obtaining surrogates' consent for genomics research in intensive care patients revealed that few wellcontrolled studies have been done on this topic. Yet, a major theme in the literature is the role of health care professionals in guiding surrogates through the informed consent process rather than simply witnessing a si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional layers of ethical complexity exist for conducting biorepository-based research in the critical care setting. (Menon & Ward, 2014; Shelton et al, 2009; Truog, 2008) Critically ill children are often too sick to provide assent, and their parents may be unusually stressed, making truly informed consent difficult. Determining the appropriate timing of consent during critical illness is also challenging, and perspectives regarding delayed consent are not well elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional layers of ethical complexity exist for conducting biorepository-based research in the critical care setting. (Menon & Ward, 2014; Shelton et al, 2009; Truog, 2008) Critically ill children are often too sick to provide assent, and their parents may be unusually stressed, making truly informed consent difficult. Determining the appropriate timing of consent during critical illness is also challenging, and perspectives regarding delayed consent are not well elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research demonstrates, however, that a number of issues and difficulties can arise when seeking to ensure participants are appropriately informed about research [3-5]. In some cases, features of the context in which research is conducted may make consent processes particularly challenging, such as when research is conducted in emergency situations [6] or in populations with low levels of literacy and limited familiarity with relevant concepts [7-9]. Aspects of specific research protocols may also prove difficult to explain: in genomic research such issues include the unfamiliar and technical research methods, the implications for participants of the complicated infrastructure and data sharing requirements, and potential consequences of future research with samples and data (the nature of which may be unknown at the time consent is sought) [10-13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular challenges can arise when seeking consent from impoverished populations with high levels of illiteracy [5-7], when seeking consent to paediatric research [8], when seeking consent to research in emergency situations [9-11] and when seeking consent to genomic research [12]. Specific challenges arising when seeking consent for genetic and genomic research include explaining the research methods, the implications of the complex informatics infrastructure required to support such studies and the potential consequences of future research with samples and data (the nature of which may be unknown at the time consent is sought)[13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%